Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
6001. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: The basic concept of 'Structure which reduces instant payout but allows potentially greater rewards overall creating a point of conflict' is not a bad one. It's just not being implemented well in it's current form. So it do...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 09:44:00
|
6002. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Stop being a drama queen, give more serious feedback, get the rest of the CSM also giving feedback as well as those who already have posted. Bring pressure to make it what it could be, rather than 'Waaaah, I hate it, just d...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 09:35:00
|
6003. CCP, There's a Problem. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
tiberiusric wrote: OMG you whining tw@ts. Big alliances trying to control eve again. its ONLY 5% jesus christ! what is up with you. Dont use the ESS you ARE NOT FORCED to. They're forced to do one or the other: lose 5% or gamble 20% against a...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 09:27:00
|
6004. CCP, There's a Problem. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pinky Hops wrote: incursions and l4's dont generate a ton of isk. Do you have an actual source for this? Because last time we saw any numbers on it, incursions and L4s generated about half as much in their agent rewards alone as all manners ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 08:42:00
|
6005. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quinn Corvez wrote: So manny tears over loosing 5% of your income... It's actually a buff to your income if you are willing to protect your space. GǪexcept it has nothing to do with protecting your space and everything to do with adding mindl...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 08:16:00
|
6006. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dillonp wrote: There is always inflation. A certain amount of inflation in an economy is healthy. (Careful management of the inflation rate is necessary) Not always, no, and either way, the inflation rate is where it's supposed to be so minim...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 07:47:00
|
6007. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: I tend to avoid answering posts using inflammatory phrasing, but I actually think your signature answers your question pretty well. Yeah, seeGǪ When I posted it without the inflammatory phrasing, it didn't generate an ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.16 05:09:00
|
6008. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So, I'm just going to have to ask (again)GǪ CCP SoniClover wrote: Based on feedback, we're looking at three things: - Time to get loot - lot of good points that the time needs to be increased - Interceptors too good - we're looking at ways to d...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 23:14:00
|
6009. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I think I didn't clarify myself too well. I wasn't suggesting they release a 5% nerf to nullsec income unannounced (oh the drama), but that they separate the ESS from the income nerf as simply the ESS as an "income boos...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 18:01:00
|
6010. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Their reasoning was probably that, if widely used, these would open the nullsec bounty isk faucet a bit to wide, and were attempting to rebalance the faucet. Really, the reception of this would have been much better h...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 17:55:00
|
6011. Defining capital ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Installing a nanofiber hull onto your ship isn't a hull upgrade? They are in the same sense as installing a 1600mm plate is a propulsion upgradeGǪ
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 17:36:00
|
6012. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: Based on feedback, we're looking at three things: - Time to get loot - lot of good points that the time needs to be increased - Interceptors too good - we're looking at ways to decrease the efficiency of using an intercept...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 17:34:00
|
6013. Defining capital ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: dexington wrote: and require advanced spaceship command skill used by capital ships, But not the capital ships skill. Yeah, I think the confusing thing there is that we actually have three tiers of GǣcommandG...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.15 14:10:00
|
6014. Question of Authority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: The funny thing is... if I posted a picture of a dozen clone mining barges these exact same people would be screaming for blood. No, why would they?
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 23:48:00
|
6015. Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edwin McAlister wrote: I have observed a drastic increase in the amount of ganking taking place in high-sec over the past several weeks. Is this a good thing or bad thing? If it's actually the case, it's a good thing, since they've become far ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 23:09:00
|
6016. Question of Authority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Sorry, I keep forgetting the party-line slogan of " There are no bots ." What party is that? None that has any connection with EVE, presumably?
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 22:15:00
|
6017. Just an idea for your consideration ccp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angelica Dreamstar wrote: I still don't see the issue though. The issue is that you're skipping game mechanics , and that you're only doing it because you pay. Both are horribly bad ideas on their own; together, it's about as awful an ide...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 20:10:00
|
6018. Just an idea for your consideration ccp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angelica Dreamstar wrote: Why would removal be the only option, if all she wants are the ability to buy more? Because the ability to pay to ignore game mechanics is an inherently harmful ability to the integrity of the game. Personally, I wo...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 15:52:00
|
6019. Just an idea for your consideration ccp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angelica Dreamstar wrote: And you believe removing it helps how? I don't. I'm simply saying that what people are asking for is the functional removal of attributes, for whatever reason. If that's what they want gone, why not ask for it to actu...
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 15:28:00
|
6020. Just an idea for your consideration ccp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tebizla wrote: Plex for remap does actually sound reasonable. Again, why not just remove attributes if they're that much of a hassle?
- by Tippia - at 2014.01.13 15:21:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |