EVE Search - Posts by Tarminic

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 126 for by author Tarminic (0,22 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. [Proposal] Improvements to the current War Declaration system - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Nhilist Originally by: Pithecanthropus Most importantly, they need a win/loss objective and an impact to the deccing corp if they fail their war objective. Plus, a counter way that a corp who is war decced can achiev... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.13 22:38:00
2. [Proposal] Improvements to the current War Declaration system - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Edited by: Tarminic on 13/08/2008 14:12:16 Originally by: Kahega Amielden No? Newbies should be able to start corps as long as they're willing to risk getting wardecced I think that this will actually end up helping new players star... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.13 14:11:00
3. [Proposal] The Standing Order: An improvement to Contracting in EVE - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Scagga Laebetrovo I was also thinking that contracts could be further enhanced if they allow temporary positive standings. E.G. you hire a corp to do some logistics work for a time period. They are automatically blue for t... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 21:54:00
4. Nerf the Nano speed, not the modules, rigs and implants. - in Assembly Hall [original thread] I really dislike hard caps on speed...it just seems like a crutch of the same type that you see in games with invisible walls. Sorry, but I can't support this. ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 20:36:00
5. [ISSUE] Forum reworking - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Tarminic I'd also like to hear about what is actually being done to improve the underlying forum code. According to the information we got at CSM meetings, there won't be any underlyin... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 18:16:00
6. [ISSUE] Forum reworking - in Assembly Hall [original thread] I'd also like to hear about what is actually being done to improve the underlying forum code. ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 17:40:00
7. [Proposal] Improvements to the current War Declaration system - in Assembly Hall [original thread] In this general discussion thread, it was asked how we could improve the war declaration system. Here are my suggestions: 1. Increase the cost of creating a corporation significantly (at least 100 million ISK) 2. Allow the defenders a one-time... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 16:47:00
8. [Proposal] Improvements to the current War Declaration system - in Assembly Hall [original thread] In this general discussion thread, it was asked how we could improve the war declaration system. Here are my suggestions: 1. Increase the cost of creating a corporation significantly (at least 100 million ISK) 2. Allow the defenders a one-time... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.12 16:47:00
9. [Compilation] The big mission running topic - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Level 4 missions in their current form do not belong in high-security space With this issue, it is hard to determine if this stems from whining and intollerance towards a certain playstyle by a vocal mino... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.11 18:12:00
10. [issue] Paladin bonuses - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: El Yatta Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: I SoStoned They will definately need a buff to web function with the upcoming Nano adjustment, though. Hey have one actually - all the web effectiveness bonu... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.08 22:09:00
11. [IDEA] Let resident players propose real names for 0.0 systems - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Yes, I'm sure that we wouldn't have 500 systems in EVE named after **** stars or phallus's. ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.08 20:53:00
12. [issue] Paladin bonuses - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: I SoStoned They will definately need a buff to web function with the upcoming Nano adjustment, though. Hey have one actually - all the web effectiveness bonuses have been increased to 10%, so a T2 web (60%) would actually... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.08 15:38:00
13. [Issue] Rigs need love from many directions! - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Awesome. ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.05 19:17:00
14. [Issue] Specific Adjustments to 0.0 Sovereignty Combat - in Assembly Hall [original thread] 1. Supported - BUT only as long as POS warfare is tied to system sovereignty. 2. Also agreed 3. Definitely agreed ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.05 19:15:00
15. [IDEA] STOP ING WITH THE GAME WE LOVE - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Red Thunder oh and yea i do represent a majority of eve, considering there is 2 and a half times more votes against the nerf than for it So please enlighten me that why that qualifies you to speak for the entirety of the ... - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.02 01:36:00
16. [IDEA] STOP ING WITH THE GAME WE LOVE - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Because 8-heatsink 'geddons made the game more fun for people who weren't sitting in the pilot's seat? ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.08.01 23:09:00
17. No Topic - in Assembly Hall [original thread] ABSOLUTELY ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.83 (Updated 7/3) - by Tarminic - at 2008.07.31 22:46:00
18. Vote of NO CONFIDENCE in Dev team - in Assembly Hall [original thread] LOL, what? Yes, you're going to VOTE ZOMG NO CONFIDENSE in the entire development team. Oh, man, burn! So what does that actually mean? Nothing. Squat. It means angry people on the forum have made posts that range from valid to completely as... - by Tarminic - at 2008.07.31 14:43:00
19. Sub-system targeting - in Assembly Hall [original thread] I really like the idea of subsystem targeting, and I have a way that it might be possible in a preliminary stage without too many balancing headaches: The chance of hitting a ship's module is relative to the weapon's signature resolution vs. the... - by Tarminic - at 2008.07.30 23:35:00
20. [Issue] Significant Problem With the Current Voting System - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Sorted stangly enough thought your thread popped up as the Nano whiners where loosing the voting war tho eh? and: .. make me My thread popped up as a response to this thread: Linkage Check the timestamps on my first ... - by Tarminic - at 2008.07.30 15:54:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.