| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
1181. T2 Titan - the return of AoE - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: Other capabilities: The only offensive capital permitted in high security space, although it is constrained to the jita undock. Also has the capacity to tank concord. approved
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 18:44:00
|
1182. T2 Titan - the return of AoE - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
supernova ranger wrote: if something like this was to be built, i think only one should be allowed undocked per system I was going to mention something about titans not being able to dock then i noticed your corp ticker
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 18:36:00
|
1183. What's the highest arty alpha you can get with a frigate? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
war dec
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 18:33:00
|
1184. Subsystem Targeting - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Damn forum ate my super length reply! Damn forum ate my super length sammich!
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 18:07:00
|
1185. Active tanking - absorbing energy. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
or you could like... overheat your hardeners?
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 18:06:00
|
1186. T2 Titan - the return of AoE - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: God mode is that you? Confirming the 'god mode' module will have to be activated to run the cyno gravity well and the capital smartbombs at full efficiency
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:55:00
|
1187. T2 Titan - the return of AoE - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Let me tell you a story about the return of the AoE... "Because T2 all the thingsGäó" Scientists in deep space have recently announced the weaponisation of the cyno generator. This modified cyno generator (which uses an immense amount of po...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:47:00
|
1188. Local Chat Hacking - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Local flawlessly showing every pilot's presence for all to see is an entitlement that has no justification. Then remove it then none of this duplication of names in local balls edit - i mean, if you must, hack your name ...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:18:00
|
1189. Summer Expansion 2012 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Petar Harad wrote: CCP Punkturis wrote: I KNOW I KNOW! but I'm not going to tell I just wanted to post here so there'd be a dev badge on the post on the front page and now everybody is going to think this is where they get some inside in...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:15:00
|
1190. T2 Dreadnought - Capital Interdictor - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Emperor Salazar wrote: No more caps, thanks. /me whispers to Emperor "it was meant to be a joke thread, but everyone took it seriously"
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:13:00
|
1191. Poll: Getting rid of "Warp to Zero" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
posting in a disguised 'get-likes' thread
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:08:00
|
1192. Local Chat Hacking - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
you either appear on local or not anything else is silly
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 17:02:00
|
1193. T2 Dreadnought - Capital Interdictor - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ms Mirple wrote: I am not opposed to T2 Capitals but like any T2 ship it would have to have a specific role. Like T2 carriers would be assault carriers that fielded Fighters and had a full rack of guns. Please don't bash that idea it was more a...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 16:58:00
|
1194. T2 Dreadnought - Capital Interdictor - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
then lets give them ridiculous resists \o/ problem solved :3
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 15:44:00
|
1195. The new module - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maybe hacking modules could get an expansion of their use? A succesful hack could force the offlined POS into some unique form of reinforcement with any of its remaining strontium, even though it was offline. This would send notifications to its...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 14:45:00
|
1196. Real Men Hull Tank - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I do agree that the hull mods need to be boosted to be in line with shield and armor mods Hull tanking doesnt need to be better, it just needs to be viable, its not like there are any ships out there with hull tank bonuses or the risk that change...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 14:25:00
|
1197. Reduce Technetium demand - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mfume Apocal wrote: my dislike has nothing to do with it nerfing my personal income (because it wont). it's because it takes out one of the major drivers of current nullsec content. tech moons are one of the only things worth risking supercaps ...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 14:18:00
|
1198. SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
posting because of updated skapper plan!
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 14:09:00
|
1199. T2 Dreadnought - Capital Interdictor - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So I herd that nulsec is slowly filling up with capital ships and that the residents cant sneeze without accidentally opening a cyno and dropping capital ships on totally innocent condor pilot enemy spais. So, taking a leaf from CCP and their ...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 14:06:00
|
1200. The Awakening trailer - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cyprus Black wrote: No offense CCP Punkturis, but I was not impressed with this video. It seemed like one of those old crappy "live action" videos that came with older Command and Conquer games. I had a hard time not laughing at the Awakeni...
- by Skippermonkey - at 2012.02.20 13:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |