EVE Search - Posts by Simetraz

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 781-800 of 1490 for by author Simetraz (0,55 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70
781. REMOVE API - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] FYI before the API was around corporations wanted a screen shot of your login page showing your characters. IT is up to you if you want to give your API away or not Funny bit is that a API isn't going to protect the corp one little bit. There ar... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.14 02:51:00
782. Are miners about to become worth their weight in gold? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Actually welcome to real world economics. I have serious suspicions that this is not a supply versus demand Issue but rather market manipulation. OMG there going to nerf A prices jump at just the news. No changes have come into effect yet but th... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.14 02:32:00
783. Nice shadow nerf to highsec ganking CCP o7o7o7o7o7o7 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Well in watching the fan fest video's there was also a comment about using the death ray and be be done with the whole thing. As in, the time you get to gank someone is the time it takes Concord to respond and that is it, and it was going to have... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.13 22:32:00
784. that took all of 12 seconds - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] HUH I wasn't planning on buying a card but it is interesting that the cards where sold out that fast . Kind of shows how much expendable ISK there is sitting around EVE. Or I wonder which alliance bought them all. - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 18:06:00
785. If it can't deploy drones...it's not a SuperCARRIER - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Well it was a quick fix do to a whine campaign. All they did was modify the existing ship not create a new component. ie to give you what you want CCP would have had to create a Fighter / Bomber Bay for carriers and supercarriers. For that reas... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 17:17:00
786. So, what WOULD have happened? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The Goons beat BOB by meta gaming they didn't beat them by combat. The Goon's had some help in the combat department. So question is did the Goon's just voice what 0.0 was already thinking ? Or did the 0.0 alliances fall into rapture at the voice... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 16:38:00
787. PVP getting hurt by the changes? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Duvida wrote: I was looking at the nerfs in mission and rat drops, and the mineral price increases and released that an important part of EVE, PVP was very much affected by replacement costs for equipment. If PVP'rs get starved because everythi... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 16:29:00
788. Where in ACOUNT managment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The EVE Online Account Management site is currently undergoing maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Go to http://www.eveonline.com/ Upper right hand corner you will see EVE websites Put you mouse cursor over it. Scol... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 16:24:00
789. Pubbies like this left alone to scrub a living? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Oh yeh there is so much red there. but I see more. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Vale_of_the_Silent#npc24 http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Tribute#npc24 http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Tenal#npc24 http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Syndicate#npc24... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 16:04:00
790. Rokh art/stats... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Nova Fox wrote: use tri exporter and crysis and import the rohk into crysis to scale and youl hvae a better idea. Or use triexporter to import it into a 3d rendering /draw program. And set it's length, the model will scale. Then you will ha... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 15:17:00
791. OutbreakDOT's new logo is offensive - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] By that logic the word carebear should also be banned. And anything at associated with a bear. Personally when I look at their Alliance symbol it looks like they are proclaiming themselves as a bunch of carebears. Irony, maybe. - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 04:56:00
792. MIGHT IS RIGHT - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Cyberbullying = RL and has absolutely nothing to do with EVE or its game play. Short and sweet. - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 04:47:00
793. Why is anyone using a Hulk over a Covetor. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Nedes Betternaem wrote: With hulkageddon coming up anyone mining with a hulk is no longer playing the odds, but rather just a moron (unless your in null sec or W-space). Your Covetor is gonna get blown up as well, but at least you can possib... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 04:35:00
794. d-scan uses AU as units!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] It would be nice to see it change from km's to AU automatically, however till then 1 AU = 149,597,870.691 kilometers which is all nice to know BUT. For D-scan just round it up 1 AU = 150 Mill km 4 AU = 600 Mill km 8 AU = 1,200 Mill KM 14 AU = 2... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 04:21:00
795. Why is anyone using a Hulk over a Covetor. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Jessie-A Tassik wrote: If you put Damage Control II and Reinforced Bulkhead II on a Covetor then you have 11,586 EHP and about 90% the mining rate of a Hulk. For something like a tenth the price? (Last time I looked, ship prices are all over t... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 03:21:00
796. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Isn't Uitra one of the career agent systems, where people embark on the Gǣmandatory deathGǥ newbie mission? Could be the map results where just surprising Here is another one on the Gallente side. COUSTER // Region - Essen... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 01:46:00
797. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Bane Necran wrote: It has always been this way. Just look at the in-game map with "ships destroyed in the last 24 hours" enabled. Hisec is a slaughterhouse. But high-sec is safe right ? - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 01:29:00
798. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] But we are not talking about Jita but rather Uitra which has twice as many ships killed every month. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/Uitra A system that has 60 people in it right now. Not Jita with 1,000 + members 24x7. The number seems out... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 01:20:00
799. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ioci wrote: Jita 4 IV campers blowing up noob ships Jita is only Ships lost (30 days) 3124 - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 01:06:00
800. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] So I was randomly clicking the eve website when I ran into this. UITRA THe Forge Security - 0.9 // Ships lost (30 days) 7526 ????? um how ? , or better yet why ? http://www.eveonline.com/universe/people-personalities/?uitra You would think 0.... - by Simetraz - at 2012.04.12 00:53:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.