| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. So... is voting over yet ? Who won ? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Semkhet Maybe it has something to do with the fact that technically speaking, there was no need to come with all this PR crap & relying on "representatives" to start with. If CCP was genuinely interested in consulting playe...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.19 10:15:00
|
62. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong There are levels of risk, taking unnecessary ones and flying foolishly does not change optimal play style. Or rather your optimal play style which is survive at any cost even if you spend a half day out there w...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.19 10:02:00
|
63. So... is voting over yet ? Who won ? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Scagga Laebetrovo D'ya think candidates can request recounts?
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.19 06:51:00
|
64. Question to CSM candidates: Titan Warfare? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Quote: lag/desynch wildcard. This is getting a real old excuse. Grow up and accept if you lose. I remember sometimes saying (joking) that my mouse was dirty when I got killed in Quake by my friends (didn't have optical mouse back then). W...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 22:17:00
|
65. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Sariyah on 18/05/2008 22:11:49 Originally by: Goumindong No, if you miss the BS, you follow it and try again. If you don't kill it totally you tie[or win partially as you have killed tacklers], as you have not lost ships. ...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 22:11:00
|
66. Under the surface - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Kelsin I mean, can you point to an actively campaigning candidate that isn't willing to listen to alternative viewpoints and take them into consideration? Goum
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 20:59:00
|
67. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong You fight to kill your ship, and not lose your own. Playing smartly in this game means that you might not kill every ship it is possible to kill but your ship will live longer. You do not have to kill a frig and t...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 19:47:00
|
68. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong What in the world are you talking about? Its not hard. When they have fast tacklers you burn away from the heavy ships and engage the tacklers. When those are dead you kill the rest of the fleet. That is optimal p...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 17:36:00
|
69. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong It is not a matter of whether or not you attempt to be get away its a matter of whether or not they let you escape. Or I let them catch me. Originally by: Goumindong You should be shooting him. How in...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 16:08:00
|
70. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong If most fights are "sort of" consensual they are not really consensual Yep they are. There's no need to formally agree to fight. If you attack, or sit and wait to be attacked, that's what I consider consentual....
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 14:30:00
|
71. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Someone has to be attacked involuntarily. Otherwise no one would die. Outsmarting your enemy sometimes works, usually doesn't. I think most fights are sort of, consentual. When either both sides think they can ...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 12:06:00
|
72. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Running away unsuccessfully Bad fc / scouts maybe, a bad reason to die indeed. I am not sure if I ever was attacked when I didn't want it. I'm sure it happened, but it's probably like 1% of cases, if that, reg...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.18 10:42:00
|
73. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong A BS takes at least 10 seconds to warp and all ships will lock it before that happens. Omg, tell me what a BS is doing at a gate 10km from the enemies if he doesn't want to engage Originally by: Goumin...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 22:13:00
|
74. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong it is quite easy to force a tanked BS gang to engage. That is quite a statement. I would like to know how. Please do explain. Originally by: Goumindong Are you stupid? No, you called me stupid. A per...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 20:55:00
|
75. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: posteroid Jeeez 5 pages of the tard and his fitting tool pvp xp/knowledge is enough to fry the mind of the most patient stfu all ready .
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 19:10:00
|
76. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Yes it does. It would only not if you could fly around a basic miner/civvie shield boosted ship and not ever engage in combat while being able to shoot enemies No it does not. You can sit in a heavy tanked bs g...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 19:08:00
|
77. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Sariyah on 17/05/2008 17:56:11 Originally by: Goumindong Engaging a superior force is foolish. This is one of the reasons that nanos[and cloaks as had been brought up] are so strong. You never have to engage a superior force...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 17:55:00
|
78. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong No, i am saying it doesn't stop the ship and doesn't return kills unless the pilot is foolish. Define foolish, one can say it is foolish o engage in a fight. Since your demagogy has been pretty inconsistent so ...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 14:52:00
|
79. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ok, we're starting to understand each other. So you do agree that mwd affects speed, great discovery But you're still saying the lack of cap doesn't affect it in a negative way. Are you saying mwds don't need cap, that they don't turn off making...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 12:39:00
|
80. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong 1. MWDs have great effects on speed. That is not the question. The question is what is the connection between a Neut and speed. And the answer there is "pretty much none" Not an answer, either yes or no. You're...
- by Sariyah - at 2008.05.17 10:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |