Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Pretty tired of what your doing CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A 'ransom' option, I'm not against. Seems like a quick-market or contract system much like bounties. As far as the trust mechanics, I prefer that the game leaves it to the players. Ransom, pay ransom, but don't hard-code any kind of restrictions....
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.26 04:34:00
|
2. EVE Launcher - a comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sturmwolke wrote: Sarmatiko wrote: Yes, their launcher made with one simple assumption that most of the playerbase are brainless idiots (and any SerB answer session proves this every time). This works perfectly in WoT, but do you really wan...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.25 20:51:00
|
3. EVE Launcher - a comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Atropos wrote: Pak Narhoo wrote: I was going to troll this thread by suggestion that people should buy a Mac and enjoy that way the old launcher but the better part of me actually only wants to ask a question to the Dev, why did you laun...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.25 19:42:00
|
4. EVE Launcher - a comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Atropos wrote: Ruze wrote: I think the op tried really hard to sound like he knew what he was talking about. I think the op failed. Many of his 'comparisons' between the new launcher and this World of Tanks launcher are very narrow and l...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.25 19:39:00
|
5. EVE Launcher - a comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think the op tried really hard to sound like he knew what he was talking about. I think the op failed. Many of his 'comparisons' between the new launcher and this World of Tanks launcher are very narrow and lack meaty, real information. But, ou...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.25 13:30:00
|
6. New Navy Battlecruisers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's possible that CCP will adjust the price in the future, if these aren't seeing enough use. That said, the real win on this will be when the cost of T2 starts to drift up as the ship overstock is steadily used up. I believe we'll see more and ...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.25 02:15:00
|
7. Getting tired of micro patches - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybelater Headache wrote: De'Veldrin wrote: Making a piece of software work perfectly is a technological impossibility unless the developer can also control the hardware, down to the part numbers, as well as the tech refreshes of the clien...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.24 21:20:00
|
8. Getting tired of micro patches - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybelater Headache wrote: CCP was able to patch the client without that launcher iirc. If you were like me, though, the patches failed about 25% of the time and I had to reinstall at least two separate clients once a month or so. I underst...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.24 20:10:00
|
9. Getting tired of micro patches - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. Witness player hate the launcher and use .exe to launch eve. 2. CCP releases patches on almost a daily basis. 3. Launcher hating player must use launcher to update game before he can use.exe. 4. CCP wins.
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.24 11:50:00
|
10. Getting tired of micro patches - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Are they patches for the launcher, or patches for the game? And if they are patches for the game, do we really want them to hold off on smaller bugfixes for a week at a time and hit us with one large patch each week? I thought this is what the l...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.24 11:41:00
|
11. So long and thanks for all the bullshit. This will be my last post. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Star Citizen will fail within two years. CCP and EvE will be here when you realize that all your hopes and dreams can't stand up to a real market. So will we, the community you hate, but also the most honest gaming community there is. See you in...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.24 00:51:00
|
12. Eve's Next Expansion? Scamming? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The reason scamming should remain in the game as it currently is, is because it is based off of stupidity. They've done everything they can to prevent players from abusing game design. But they don't prevent players from abusing each other.
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.23 21:50:00
|
13. Undock Animation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I want something like this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=229993&find=unread Which would cover undocking, AND be optional.
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.23 20:28:00
|
14. Racial Industrials: The Quick Fix, or the Massive Overhaul? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Ideally, a "massive overhaul" with keen options, customisability, racial variations, Q-ships, yadda yadda, would be awesome. Resources are limited; haulers need to be able to move stuff around quickly either by virtuue of movin...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.22 03:16:00
|
15. Radial Menu - action mapping - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bakuhz wrote: ccp we all cry for a off button for this radila menu listen to the players the menu is double trouble for the majority. adding new stuff to it yesteray good fine with me but '' THA OFF BUTTON PLEASE '' Listen to the Player base o...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 10:18:00
|
16. Radial Menu - action mapping - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Honestly, I use it and the drop-menu pretty much 50/50. I moved it over to the right mouse button, though, because the radial menu was going off almost every time I tried to adjust my camera angle. It works and looks good. Lags out sometimes, an...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 04:35:00
|
17. Racial Industrials: The Quick Fix, or the Massive Overhaul? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Halcyon Ingenium wrote: Fair enough, but again, what corp that is involved in a situation that requires industrial reconfiguration that also needs a small ship for it? I understand what your saying, I'm questioning whether or not anyone in a ...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 04:32:00
|
18. Racial Industrials: The Quick Fix, or the Massive Overhaul? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Halcyon Ingenium wrote: Ruze wrote: Halcyon Ingenium wrote: Quit it with the foreplay and just say what you want changed. Not sure. I'd like to see some cool new type of industrial ships, but when I got thinking of a F&I post, I re...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 04:08:00
|
19. Racial Industrials: The Quick Fix, or the Massive Overhaul? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Halcyon Ingenium wrote: Quit it with the foreplay and just say what you want changed. Not sure. I'd like to see some cool new type of industrial ships, but when I got thinking of a F&I post, I realized that the T1 haulers hadn't been cha...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 03:50:00
|
20. Racial Industrials: The Quick Fix, or the Massive Overhaul? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is not about the art department. Industry. In EvE, industry is actually a fairly all-encompassing term used to describe nearly everything not related to combat. Industry involves mining ore, mining ice, mining gas, refining ore into minera...
- by Ruze - at 2013.06.21 03:42:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |