EVE Search - Posts by Rroff

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 830 for by author Rroff (0,17 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40
1. Sticky:[Odyssey] X-L Weapons Balance - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Oxandrolone wrote: :( I can understand nerfing the moros tracking but optimal also? It will also skew autocannon optimal v blaster optimal with XL unless XL autocannons are also getting knocked back to 16000 base optimal. Also wondering i... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 21:43:00
2. Sticky:[Odyssey] X-L Weapons Balance - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Gypsio III wrote: I don't think he's trying to stop dread blapping, I think he's trying to improve balance between dreads. I think so to but not sure this is the best way to go about it - I'd rather see some adjustments to the whole dreadn... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 21:33:00
3. My friends, say goodbye to cap escalations as you knew them. - in Wormholes [original thread] I'm not convinced personally these changes will make much difference aside from minorly penalising the unprepared. From some quick scratching in terms of tracking if your doing sites properly theres no real change to applied damage in low transver... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 18:59:00
4. Sticky:[Odyssey] X-L Weapons Balance - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Kacer Xenro wrote: Oh great, i just finished Siege 5 for a moros. Now crosstraining into amarr While I'm guessing thats somewhat in jest - theres a fair point in there - Eve has always been about playing the long game and far too many chang... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 18:47:00
5. Sticky:[Odyssey] X-L Weapons Balance - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Seems mostly a pointless change to me - won't make much odds to capital on capital action except in some maybe fringe cases, won't really have any impact on dread blapping if properly supported, slightly brings the nag and moros inline with each o... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 18:07:00
6. Working on EVE videos - in Wormholes [original thread] Yup and currently have outdated nebulas. K-Space backgrounds have now been updated not only with higher resolution but to accurately represent what part of new eden your currently in - so it wouldn't make sense for them to be used in wormholes. - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 16:32:00
7. Question on PvP Etiquette - in Wormholes [original thread] Deshrel Sculpin wrote: I know I will get all sorts of sarcastic answers but honestly we are trying to learn to pvp but while we have been in a WH for a long time our friends who started us on this game were total carebears :P Its the peopl... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 15:33:00
8. Should CCP delete Nullsec & add more WH's? - in Wormholes [original thread] Wouldn't be a terrible idea to add more null->null wormholes and have a longer delay before you show in local after entering via a wormhole rather than a stargate (makes sense if you think about it). Granted would upset many nullsec residents b... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.17 14:37:00
9. Rebalancing Fleet Composition?! - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] What your looking for is called wormhole space... where for many intents and purposes the fleets are limited to 3 capitals, 50 cruiser hulls and or combinations of battleships, etc. - by Rroff - at 2013.05.16 22:20:00
10. Locking bug in capital escalations? - in Wormholes [original thread] I'd say the other possibility you were in a Wolf Rayet and the visual effect wasn't taking the sig bonus into account but while that wouldn't have any effect on sleepers it also wouldn't show as bugged locking a POS. - by Rroff - at 2013.05.16 19:37:00
11. Locking bug in capital escalations? - in Wormholes [original thread] I'm guessing this is probably a new issue but I've very infrequently seen an issue that seems to be related to the leadership skill where it seems certain fleet compositions aren't having their skills relating to targetting stuff applied properl... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.16 19:26:00
12. Remove Titans & Superscarriers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Xeros Black wrote: It seems to me like the last bit to balance supers and titans out would be an anti-capital ship counter something like a stealth bomber only anti titan / super. Maybe a Cruiser class ship that equips capital sized torps. Som... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.15 19:38:00
13. Remove Titans & Superscarriers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] monkfish2345 wrote: Sadly i think CCP have invested too much into them to simply agree to remove them. But at the same time it's difficult to see how they can ever really be put into proper balance. Unless they are massively powerful they have... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.15 18:11:00
14. POS littering of high low and null has been solved by this one simple and easy fix. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] RubyPorto wrote: You don't need to hire Mercs, you can do it yourself. If he actually doesn't care about it, you can fit up a few 1300 DPS AFK Geddons for cheap and kill it in a few hours of napping (~70m EHP for Caldari Large vs Multi > 15 ... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.15 17:18:00
15. Hypothetically Speaking - in Wormholes [original thread] Not sure Phoenix will ever get any real love towards knocking down sleepers - they were designed for knocking down structures and its only the broken chance to hit formula really that lets turret dreads hit smaller targets relatively well (tho eve... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.14 23:36:00
16. Strengthening Low Sec - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] The main problem with lowsec and highsec is the lack of granularity in the risk involved. e.g. the quaint notion of protecting your mining barges at a belt with a few combat ships... lol... lowsec needs more opportunities for the extension of hig... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.14 20:33:00
17. Sticky:[Odyssey] Navy Battleships - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Seems like mostly solid changes to me and brings back some of the more powerful setups... for a price. Only concern I'd have is that the navy mega seems to have a little bit too low base armor HP. - by Rroff - at 2013.05.14 14:32:00
18. Naglafars in C5s? - in Wormholes [original thread] Joan Greywind wrote: A thing most people forget is that tracking plays a pretty big role in these sites, which (to my knowledge) the moros does best. Also even paper dps the moros still does the most even after the buff (remember not to use ant... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.13 19:23:00
19. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Officer Nyota Uhura wrote: Rroff wrote: TBH I'm posting too much in specifics tho my real complaint is the fact that a lot of rigs that are commonly used day to day in other parts of eve outside of general nullsec use are suddenly going to b... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.12 21:05:00
20. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Veshta Yoshida wrote: I know where you are coming from and what you are peddling, but think about it .. all rigs will now have an effect on capital mods . That is HUGE! Fitting for pure cap is still possible of course but it will no longer... - by Rroff - at 2013.05.12 18:02:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.