Pages: [1] |
1. New Blog, Chronotis follows-up on the Rorqual and more - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thanks for listening. A-WAR might be Recruiting!
- by Pepperami - at 2007.08.13 17:44:00
|
2. New Blog, Chronotis follows-up on the Rorqual and more - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What an awful change, I can't believe anyone thinks this is in any way a good idea. (and looking at the replies, clearly no-one does) A-WAR might be Recruiting!
- by Pepperami - at 2007.08.12 22:52:00
|
3. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Pretty poor nos changes. Dedicated nos ships should not suffer as greatly in the nerf as for ex. nos domi. I'm disappointed CCP did not realise this. Hopefully upon review they'll work on it - obviously it was notable curse was not listed in the k...
- by Pepperami - at 2007.07.30 16:20:00
|
4. Revelations 2.0.1 Post-Patch Feedback Thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Morenia Notton Corp negative standigs work fine, but alliance negative standings are not displayed in local. This. And I don't see any mention in notes about desync fixes, was this addressed or is engagements continuing...
- by Pepperami - at 2007.07.03 16:40:00
|
5. New Dev Blog, LeMousse on Revelations 2 Sovereignity - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thanks for the replies Le Mousse.. Why is it not considered a good move to make the Station Services of the Capital system invulnerable also? Seems like it would follow naturally with the invulnerable system idea?
- by Pepperami - at 2007.06.16 00:09:00
|
6. New Dev Blog, LeMousse on Revelations 2 Sovereignity - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
First off, thanks for this, been waiting for this info great figures, they explain it really well. But I do have a couple of questions; 1) What happens if green tried to put pos up in pink's capital while it was invulnerable? Is that impossible...
- by Pepperami - at 2007.06.13 21:03:00
|
7. Bloggers #58, If ya can't stand the heat, get out of the blob - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Remote ecm burst sounds like a poorly considered idea. First off, close proximity is not the cause, 'nerfing' it will remove certain tactics which actually counter focused fire (plates, remote reps, logistic drones, 'safety in numbers' vs tacklers...
- by Pepperami - at 2007.04.26 01:26:00
|
8. New Blog from IA. Arkanon on GMs and Privacy - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Congrats enslaver, they game benefits a GM of your knowledge and experience. As for the people who took pleasure in outing an innocent ccp employee.. I hope one day you're ashamed. [ EVE TASK BAR? ]
- by Pepperami - at 2007.03.02 18:15:00
|
9. New Blog from IA. Arkanon on GMs and Privacy - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Congrats enslaver, they game benefits a GM of your knowledge and experience. As for the people who took pleasure in outing an innocent ccp employee.. I hope one day you're ashamed. [ EVE TASK BAR? ]
- by Pepperami - at 2007.03.02 18:15:00
|
10. Bloggers #52, Tuxford's Take on Need for Speed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
No way do MWDs need a nerf, they aren't the problem.. It's the mix of nanos, inertias and snakes. Let's be honest if you want one of these 'uber' phoons that go 8k you need to be spending much more isk than for a faction ship or even capital ship...
- by Pepperami - at 2007.02.16 14:11:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |