Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Planetary Interaction v2 Info and Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Imuran Real big issues with the scanning interface - red/green color blind here and struggling. Maybe not overlaying the scanner on top of the planet background might help - just overlay it on some neutral color Damn. I ...
- by Marlenus - at 2010.03.31 23:29:00
|
2. Planetary Launch Containers not on d-scan after launch? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't have a problem with the idea that a smart player in an expensive blockade runner (made more expensive by rigs and modules to get up to 10k m3) can safely pick up his cheap goodies IF HE IS LIGHTNING FAST AND DOES NOT LINGER for more than a...
- by Marlenus - at 2010.03.25 23:47:00
|
3. Dominion preliminary patch notes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm in the position to join with the chorus of whines about dumbing down the skill requirements -- like anybody who trained up the hard way, it always gives me a pang when this happens -- but I won't, because I think I understand the game design r...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.09.18 14:45:00
|
4. Assault Frigate Boost Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If we are going to return to the second golden age of nano, then missiles need to be at least partially un-nerfed. They're already pretty shaky against small fast targets on afterburner. They'll be a lot more shaky against high-speed assault friga...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.09.17 18:57:00
|
5. Dual-signature bug? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is one of several bugs (see also, broken filters) that was so obvious, everyone who probes found it within minutes after the release of Apocrypha 1.1. It's rather a mystery how bugs this obvious don't get picked up in internal testing. The f...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.17 18:50:00
|
6. Can we please have a timeline for the fixing of the scan probing bugs? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree. I think, having missed the obvious patch where these fixes should have been, it's fair to ask for some feedback on when this stuff will be addressed. ------------------ Ironfleet.com
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.14 19:40:00
|
7. Scan bugs fixed in patch? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't have a SISI client patched up at the moment. Have any of the scanning bugs been fixed on SISI? ------------------ Ironfleet.com
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.13 19:22:00
|
8. New download system in testing. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You're trying to reinvent the wheel, in world full of really excellent wheels. This makes you look like Thrud the caveman, clunking along on mostly-square stones. Just use torrents already. More to the point, it's totally unacceptable to use thi...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.08 15:19:00
|
9. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Marlenus on 08/05/2009 14:56:07 Originally by: Dibsi Dei /thread Quoted for truth. And to save this post from being pure spam, I'll point out that lots of people are thrilled with the new bomber, we just aren't posting th...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.08 14:56:00
|
10. CCP plz fix the despawn rate in w-space - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Some Advisor ...what about that post where someone said "awwww, no **** respawns when i got my pos up" and a dev said something along the lines of "this is by design" ? That thread is linked higher in this one, and in fact...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.05.05 01:00:00
|
11. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: OilSlick Rick so you found people in wh ratting and attacked them? Well, we found people in wormholes and attacked them. What they thought they were doing there is not necessarily clear. ------------------ Ironfleet.com
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.30 14:07:00
|
12. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Proof is in the pudding, I finally got to take my Manticore out on a hunting trip last night with the boys from TEARS. It was a small worm-hole diving gang, just four or five of us, with an electronic attack frigate, a HIC, a covops, and a couple ...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.29 15:40:00
|
13. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: OilSlick Rick Originally by: Marlenus My alliance ran a small wormhole operation today, hunting sleeper hunters. It was a small all-frigate gang to maximize mobility through the wormholes, and they took along a coupl...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.23 23:49:00
|
14. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My alliance ran a small wormhole operation today, hunting sleeper hunters. It was a small all-frigate gang to maximize mobility through the wormholes, and they took along a couple of SBs to stiffen up their DPS. I wasn't there, but the word from ...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.23 03:02:00
|
15. W-Space 1.1 Change - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: raylon Am i to believe that if one does spawn it will be the mother load or what? Pretty much this -- I am in one of the shallowest w-systems and it has multiple belts that include the ABC ores, spodumain, pretty much ever...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.17 15:47:00
|
16. W-space post-patch - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've seen a surplus of worthless roids, nothing to do with scanning, just a waste of space. Consolidating those into fewer and larger belts seems like pure win. Gas sites, on the other hand, never struck me as being in surplus. ------------------...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.15 05:40:00
|
17. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
All right! These changes just keep getting better. Now, if I understand correctly, we're back to a bomber that can be used from range (if you're willing to grant alert targets time to warp away) and has a bigger boom against bigger ships, which i...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.06 18:35:00
|
18. Tritanium - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sigras now i know invisible hand of the market and all of that I think the thread was pretty much over at this point. I mean seriously, how is this a "problem"? As the price of trit continues to rise, people will mine mor...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.03 16:52:00
|
19. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If I worked at CCP, the over-the-top kvetching in this thread would inspire me to make an April 1 post about the new new concept for this ship class. Hint: It's all about small smartbombs! ------------------ Ironfleet.com
- by Marlenus - at 2009.04.01 03:23:00
|
20. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Nagatok i am going to assume that all these people who are trying to say "lets accept these changes" are idiots/morons who either do not fly or do not regularly fly said ship....that being the case keep your noses out? You...
- by Marlenus - at 2009.03.31 17:29:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |