Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate me.
- by Kozmic - at 2013.09.09 17:18:00
|
2. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
[Kozmic], 02, 03, 08, 12, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22, 28, 29, 36, 41, 44, 47, 48, 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 64, 69, 71, 72, 76, 79, 82, 84
- by Kozmic - at 2013.08.02 12:39:00
|
3. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Idiocy. And even if he did resign as a CSM 6 member, the CSM 7 is something else - the cards are shuffled anew and there is no connection between the two. Free Mittani!
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.29 06:56:00
|
4. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: This is clearly out of scope for this release, but I'm having a think about it anyway. My major concern is that it seems like it's got exactly the same overall goal as range-based falloff (ie, outside your optimal damage z...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.29 05:51:00
|
5. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ivana Twinkle wrote: I take it you havent read the thread where these graphs was requested by greyscale BTW.. how do we feel about the fact that CCP Greyscale can't do a few clicks in EFT himself to check stuff out? Preferably before doing ...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.27 18:57:00
|
6. Incoming titan adjustments - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'm Down wrote: There is a reason why IGÇÖve said for the past 2 years that adjusting tracking will not fix the problem. Just like fixing lock time also does not address the problem at all. You developers have for years completely ignored you...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.20 14:07:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Destroyer and Battlecruiser reimbursement: it has been said before, but allow us to repeat again, that we do not want to cut ships you can already fly. Thus, having BC skill at 5 would mean you get all four variations ...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.06 23:09:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: Kozmic wrote: Yes - cause God knows CCP never promised anything it didn't follow through. Enjoing walking around your establishments talking to other players in sov-iterated 0.0 with fixed supercaps, are you? Heaven ...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.06 18:28:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Cronus Zontanos wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: We'll sit down and have a chat about it, but what we're looking to do is create a solid ship scheme, not take things away from people. You'll be reimbursed properly. People need to stop freaki...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.06 18:25:00
|
10. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tsubutai wrote: Should also add that I'm a bit sceptical about the idea of rebalancing ships to fit specific roles - while it sounds intriguing, I think it could also lead to excessive pigeonholing.. I'd rather have pigeonholing than useless...
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.06 18:18:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
For those of us with all racial sub-caps, that is a lot of re-training. SP reimbursment should take that into account - if I had BC V and have race X BS V, then I should get race X BC V. Edit: also, :ccp:
- by Kozmic - at 2012.03.06 18:07:00
|
12. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Hybrid Turrets - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: Perdition64 wrote: CCP Tallest, any plans on further developing the hybrid changes before patch day so they can actually make an impact come Winter? Yes indeed. I was just about to post an update. * Hybrid turret reloa...
- by Kozmic - at 2011.11.09 09:19:00
|
13. Sticky:CCP Focuses on EVE Universe - A CCP Announcement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Manifest wrote: My good friend CCP Fallout wrote a heartfelt message that she shared with #tweetfleet. You may remember her from such things as deleting your post or promoting your awesome player creation. I asked her if I could also share ...
- by Kozmic - at 2011.10.19 19:28:00
|
14. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Good stuff. About time..
- by Kozmic - at 2011.10.10 17:00:00
|
15. Sticky:Issues thread for the new font on SiSi - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Punkturis wrote: uhm I don't know where you heard that but the fontsize functionality in the chat will just stay as it is.. no need to be spreading rumors here While you're at it, please add an option to remove character portraits fro...
- by Kozmic - at 2011.10.06 12:54:00
|
16. Sticky:New dev blog: A letter to the followers of EVE - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This must have been difficult to write. Respect. But, as you say, we will be watching what you do, not just what you say.
- by Kozmic - at 2011.10.05 17:45:00
|
17. CSM Statement regarding CCP refocusing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
+1.
- by Kozmic - at 2011.09.23 16:55:00
|
18. Sticky:New Dev Blog: The moments that define history - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fallout wrote: The latest dev blog from CCP Zulu gives us a heads up on some exciting things coming to EVE Online. "Prepare to publish a dev blog!" "Preparing to publish a dev blog, sir!" "Prepare to announce changes!" "Preparing to an...
- by Kozmic - at 2011.09.22 21:06:00
|
19. @CCP Fallout, Announcement? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Fallout Really, this needs to stop. That is what we are saying.
- by Kozmic - at 2011.06.24 18:20:00
|
20. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: lilol' me 1) Why do you never listen to your players 2) Why create the CSM when you never listen 3) Why do you not listen to your own staff 4) Why do you for the past few years bring out increasingly poor expansions 5) Why ...
- by Kozmic - at 2011.06.24 11:22:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |