EVE Search - Posts by King Rothgar

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1781-1800 of 2901 for by author King Rothgar (0,48 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100
1781. FW/low sec ship types - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] BC's are versatile, they can effectively fight everything from frigates to carriers/dreads. Pirates tend to fly heavy however as tanking sentries mandates it. BS/BC pirate gangs are the standard but you won't see them sitting on a gate unless they... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.10 15:24:00
1782. [Proposal] Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Assembly Hall [original thread] The old DD couldn't kill 30 BC's. A typical BC has 70k-110k EHP, the old DD did 65k damage if my memory is correct. That's pretty tankable. I would support increasing the deaggression timer some or even scaling it with ship size but introducing DD... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.10 07:43:00
1783. Stealth Bomber vs. Recon - in Ships and Modules [original thread] It depends on the recon. The pilgrim is a solo pirate's dream ship. It doesn't have much dps and is terribly slow but completely shuts down active tanks and disables turrets. If you decloak within 10km of a gunboat, you are almost guaranteed the k... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.10 07:24:00
1784. [Proposal] Warp speed differential - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.09 11:04:00
1785. Need a Lv IV mssn buddy Amarr - in Missions & Complexes [original thread] If you want to repair amarr faction standing, you will need to run their lvl1 missions or go to an amarr ally such as caldari, khanid or ammatar mandate. Faction standing increases cannot be split. The rewards can, even the corp standing can be, b... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.09 06:56:00
1786. [Proposal] Impliement a mechanic to allow creation of deep safe spots - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 21:35:00
1787. [Proposal] Remove bookmarks of deep safe spots - in Assembly Hall [original thread] One more thing, anyone here ever hear of deep space probes? They are designed specifically for probing out those in deep safe spots. They don't have their old 1000 au range but it's still crazy far. Thus far you shall read, but no further; for th... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 21:22:00
1788. PETITION Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Yep, terrible idea. Also, don't cross post. You made a thread already in assembly hall. You don't need a second here. Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 21:17:00
1789. [Proposal] Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Me, no, I don't station camp in a carrier. The lock time is too slow and the dps is terribly unreliable. Not a big fan of station camping or gate camping anyways. I have no respect for station hugging capitals either. Real men warp their carrier t... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 21:11:00
1790. [Proposal] Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Assembly Hall [original thread] The minutes say a CSM wanted it reintroduced, it did not say CCP was actually interested in doing so. Only that they would look into it. It's a very bad idea, it basically destroyed low sec for the few days it existed. If you think low sec is dead... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 20:10:00
1791. What would happen if CCP only allowed one account per person? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Number of eve subscribers would likely be halved. Many don't have two accounts, but some have 3-4 to make up for them. I suspect the average is about two. I have two myself, one is an outlaw, the other was a hauler alt but seems to be going the ou... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 19:52:00
1792. [Proposal] Remove bookmarks of deep safe spots - in Assembly Hall [original thread] It's fair, I made a 270au deep safe yesterday. Not supported. Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 19:44:00
1793. [Proposal] Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: SFShootme Originally by: King Rothgar It got removed because there is no way to counter a titan reasonably in low sec due to the inability to use bubbles. It was a bug, was removed in the first patch and was listed i... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 19:37:00
1794. Navy Frigates: What's the Point? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] What you say is largely true but not totally. The slicer for example is great but you can't fit a t2 disruptor on it. You must either use a t1 or a republic fleet (or equivalent). I went the cheap route, faint warp disruptor I. It's not ideal, but... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 19:24:00
1795. [Proposal] Bring back Low-Sec Doomsdaying - in Assembly Hall [original thread] It got removed because there is no way to counter a titan reasonably in low sec due to the inability to use bubbles. It was a bug, was removed in the first patch and was listed in the patch notes. /not supported Thus far you shall read, but no f... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 17:53:00
1796. Show me your favorit amarr BS fittings! - in Ships and Modules [original thread] [Armageddon, Bombs away!] Damage Control I Armor Thermic Hardener I Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane I Co-Processor I Inertia Stabilizers I Warp Core Stabilizer I Warp Core Stabilizer I 1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates I Heavy Capacitor Booster I, ... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.08 08:20:00
1797. Solo Carrier for PVP/PVE in 0.0? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Carriers are great for the really high end pve and that isn't belt ratting. For lvl5's (ungated) and ungated plex's, they are unmatched in cost effectiveness. For pvp, solo in a carrier isn't really practical. I do have some solo kills in my carri... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.07 10:16:00
1798. FW advice needed. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Read the mission briefing, it tells you exactly what you have to do on FW missions. Unlike normal missions where you typically have to kill the specified target and everything else on grid, FW missions only require you to kill a specific structure... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.07 10:04:00
1799. Why the hatred for hulk? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Hulks are easy targets because they typically have a weak tank, are afk and stationary for extended periods of time. The loot they drop is mediocre but if using 3x t1 fitted cruisers or less to gank them, it's marginally profitable. My experience ... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.07 04:20:00
1800. Why Raven? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Liang, I'm pretty sure my pulse abaddon will kill any angel BS before your first missile hits the target. I'd say that's pretty quick. To put this in perspective, my pve abaddon 2 volley's angel BC's with a RoF of about 5 seconds. Against sansha/... - by King Rothgar - at 2010.04.06 17:17:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.