EVE Search - Posts by King Rothgar

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 101-120 of 2900 for by author King Rothgar (0,61 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
101. Question for some vets about capital pilots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Brooks Puuntai wrote: Train for a Nidhoggur. Be unique. Actually I like the niddy, rep amount bonus combined with both armor and shield reps is pretty handy. If we're talking triage, then I'm inclined to say the niddy is the superior ship s... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.16 21:57:00
102. Question for some vets about capital pilots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] As said, it depends on where you plan to go with it. If your plan is to fly carriers, then train it on your main since it should already have support skills. But if you plan to use a carrier only as a stepping stone to a SC, then it may make more ... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.16 19:56:00
103. How about reintroducing the EVE WEBSITES drop down menu on the main page, - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Same deal, poof, gone. Was there yesterday but not today. I guess they decided we troll too much, no more eve-o forums for us. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.16 19:41:00
104. winterexpansion: BCs, Command ships and battleships - including new fleetboost ship - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] -1, pointless change. Also, you really hate damnations don't you? Biggest nerf to a ship ever proposed I think . - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.15 20:43:00
105. Losec Cyno Change. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] JF's are basically invulnerable to attack barring remarkable stupidity but this isn't the solution. Not supported. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.14 18:07:00
106. The Case Against Nerfing the Hurricane - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I consider the hurricane to be fine. I fly all 4 races at the BC level. The hurricane is the most versatile and it certainly nano's the best, but in that nano fit it's tank is basically wet tissue with it's single LSE and invuln (+ rigs/DCII). In ... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.14 17:53:00
107. Combat Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Navy ships are affected as they are, with the exception of the navy scorp, nothing more than improved versions of the base model. Any changes to the base model must be copied to the navy version. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.12 14:36:00
108. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] My alt received a warning for this a couple days ago. A player petitioned me for decloaking him, not generating lag. However, I was still formally warned for doing this and all drones were despawned. Upon petitioning the warning I was told that al... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.11 17:17:00
109. In game kill board. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I support everything posted. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.08 20:50:00
110. FW is not for farming - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Veshta Yoshida wrote: Instead of removing a metric ton of options from the combatants arsenals (everything cloaky) to end mission farming; 1. CCP in all their wisdom, decided that what happens in FW plexes is to be treated differently than wha... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.08 11:29:00
111. Tactical Guidance Ship Tech 2 Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Supported for 250km range or less, system wide is overpowered. I would recommend 30s cycle time, like the HIC point. Also suggest making it have very high resistances and stiff armor/shields like CS's. As a balanced ship, I see it as a brick tank ... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.08 04:10:00
112. FW is not for farming - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I'm getting more than a little annoyed with the amount of farming in FW right now. I'm talking about both missions and plexes. CCP has put forward a solid proposal for solving the plex farming issues, but that still leaves missions. Lately I've be... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.08 01:47:00
113. Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] CCP Ytterbium wrote: Level1: * +5 station manufacturing, copy, ME, PE, Invention slots * 10% market tax reduction * 10% repair cost reduction * 5% manufacturing time reduction Level2: * +10 station manufacturing, copy, ME, PE, Invention slots... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.07 18:05:00
114. Light Year Distance? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I saw this incredible thing in game called a capital navigation window a while back. It listed all sorts of crazy stuff like systems within your ship's jump range, how far away they are (in LY) and how much fuel would be consumed to reach it. It e... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.06 11:55:00
115. Admit it: Faction Warfare is a failed mechanic - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] The FW plexing mechanic is broken, FW as a whole is not. I would support adding pirate factions to it but not deleting the empire FW. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.04 19:20:00
116. Current incursion rewards illogical from CONCORD's PoV, let's fix this. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Supported. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.01 16:18:00
117. T2 Capital Mods - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Supported though I'm not sure on t2 fighters/fighter-bombers. - by King Rothgar - at 2012.09.01 16:17:00
118. Give us radar - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Tenris Anis wrote: Mandos2k wrote: King Rothgar wrote: 7) both combat and core probes are powerful active scanning devices and as such will show up on everyone's radar set regardless of its mode at extreme ranges (system wide). MOAR CA... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.08.30 17:37:00
119. Give us radar - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Loius Woo wrote: Also, there is a problem with it as you describe and that is the warp in ability for things at close range. That means that snipers are even more screwed than they were by on grid scanning probes. I also think that the best way... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.08.27 11:07:00
120. Give us radar - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I was very tempted to tie this into a local chat change proposal but opted not to simply because of how beaten to death that topic is. I am also well aware that it wouldn't actually be radar, it would be a radar like device operating on a technolo... - by King Rothgar - at 2012.08.26 18:25:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.