| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
41. Consequences of Retribution expansion - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I was going by his foolish statement and weak combat record, not post count.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.13 18:25:00
|
42. Consequences of Retribution expansion - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
By popular I mean by t1 cruiser standards, which isn't saying a whole lot. You should probably refrain from such comments given your nooblet status as well.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.13 16:55:00
|
43. Consequences of Retribution expansion - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It seems here is the most relevant place to post this, so here it is. Below is what I think will happen as a result of the proposed changes/additions in retribution. These are fairly obvious to me and most I've talked to. The devs need to be aware...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.13 15:45:00
|
44. Assault ships - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I can't remember the last time I fitted a MWD to an AF. They are almost exclusively AB ships, the MWD business is for inties and some of the faction frigs. So I agree it's a pointless bonus. Fortunately, the ships as is are solid even with the poi...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.12 10:07:00
|
45. T3 Cloaking Change Idea - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think the t3's are well balanced with other classes overall. They are inferior to the recons for the EW support role and inferior to logi at any range beyond 6-7km. The only thing they genuinely beat are HAC's but then again they also cost 3x as...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.11 05:28:00
|
46. Crime Watch 2.0 Issues: - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Incursion fleets are high on dps but not much else. They really aren't that dangerous imho.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.10 18:34:00
|
47. Crime Watch 2.0 Issues: - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Several interesting quotes have come out of the Crimewatch 2.0 Discussion Thread , and I thought I'd make sure the General EvE community knows about them. Please, post any concerns you have in the appropriate threa...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.10 18:02:00
|
48. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You sir have a poor grasp on how the game works. Cruisers MWD around, that's what they are for. The whole point of a cruiser is greater mobility than a BC or BS. If your cruiser is slower than your BC/BS, then why would you ever bother with it? Am...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.06 11:53:00
|
49. [Proposal] Declare Convo Spamming an Exploit - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Never convo bombed someone nor has it been done to me, but I am well aware of this non exploit exploit. I agree it needs to officially be deemed an exploit. Obviously a code change is needed as well to make it impossible to do in the future. I dis...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 13:04:00
|
50. WTG Tuskers - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Congrats, I always have liked the tuskers.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 08:59:00
|
51. For all the FW peeps: "Diagonal plexing" - working as intended? - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: That being said, I have heard of people infiltrating plexes with recons to scram and web the plexer. They do this for the jollies, which is what PvP is supposed to be about IMHO. PvP shouldn't be about kill mails, ISK efficien...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 07:51:00
|
52. Amount of subscibers, EvE vs other mmo - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve is radically different from most other games these days. It is a hardcore MMO in a world of softcore casual ones like WoW and guild wars. Hardcore games always have smaller player bases. Another game I play is Rise of Flight, it's a hardcore c...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 03:53:00
|
53. My friend needs clothes... - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
2nd best thread ever, the best was the corpse launcher one on the old forums.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 03:02:00
|
54. When is an Exploit not an Exploit. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some of us like to use the convo system to you know, actually talk with people. That is what it is there for yes? As said many times, disabling invites disables *all* invites from people not in your address book. It doesn't factor standings or any...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.05 02:55:00
|
55. When is an Exploit not an Exploit. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
BlueMajere wrote: King Rothgar wrote: You can turn on autoreject however that also rejects both chat and fleet invites from corp mates, allies and blues. Needless to say that's problematic. If it only blocked neutrals and reds, it wouldn't b...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.04 15:37:00
|
56. what pirate faction ships are good armor tankers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'll get all sorts of hate for this, but the cynabal actually armor tanks really nicely too. Armor is far from dead as well, anywhere you can dictate the starting range armor tanks do well.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.04 07:23:00
|
57. When is an Exploit not an Exploit. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You can turn on autoreject however that also rejects both chat and fleet invites from corp mates, allies and blues. Needless to say that's problematic. If it only blocked neutrals and reds, it wouldn't be an issue. It's an exploit, plain and simple.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.04 04:30:00
|
58. Heretic fitting - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'm mostly interested in solo/duo type stuff, so the last one is it. Fairly pathetic that you have to drop to a couple of t1 launchers due to PG/CPU. I'm really not happy with that. I'll keep toying in eft to see if I can squeeze something out. CC...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.03 13:28:00
|
59. When is an Exploit not an Exploit. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I agree with you completely. It is an exploit even if CCP doesn't recognize it as such. Deliberating taking actions to crash or lag out another player's client can not be tolerated. It quite literally breaks the game for the player in question.
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.03 10:11:00
|
60. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The proposed omen is still a broken ship. No ship should ever have a "10% per level cap usage" bonus. Remove that bonus from the game completely. By giving it that bonus, it is effectively a single bonus ship like the current maller, omen and the ...
- by King Rothgar - at 2012.10.03 10:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |