EVE Search - Posts by King Rothgar

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 381-400 of 2900 for by author King Rothgar (0,47 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
381. Level 5 Missions - in Missions & Complexes [original thread] Cmdr Tarlton wrote: I have tried very hard to find current information about level 5 missions. I've been running level 4s for a few years now and of course level 5s are next? Or are level 5s so over run by pirates and griefers that they flat o... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.24 18:58:00
382. [Combat Feature] - Backlash/Backfire - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] This proposal is almost as good as the corpse launcher one. Just say'n. - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.24 14:31:00
383. [Combat Feature] - Backlash/Backfire - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Flashrain wrote: Metal Icarus wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: target: hulk veld goes back into asteroid target: noctis ship is restored back to working condition upon salvage This could turn a noctis into a captial ship rescuing mac... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.24 01:06:00
384. Navy issue battlecruisers - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Soon Shin wrote: Navy Battlecruisers concerns me in that it would be equal or superior to field command ships. Command ships need buffing for the costs and the skill prerequisite needed to fly them. Either Navy Battlecruisers have to be gimpe... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.23 11:45:00
385. BC rig adjustment - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] You know, once upon a time all ships used large rigs. In fact I still have a few of them. Back then, BC's and t1 cruisers were actually pretty well balanced with each other. The reason is no one bothered rigging t1 cruisers as it wasn't at all cos... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.23 11:23:00
386. BC rig adjustment - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] As said, CCP sets mineral requirements and relative requirements between small/medium/large whatevers. As such, although they don't set hard price tags on things, they can control the relative prices and that's all that matters. Anyways, back to t... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.22 21:18:00
387. Eran Mintor BIOMASSED [Amarr FC] - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] I have mixed thoughts on eran mintar's demise. On one hand I expect fewer amarr fleets, which is bad for me. On the other hand the guy is an ass and so the game as a whole is better off without him, assuming he did actually quit. So not sure what ... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.22 21:07:00
388. BC rig adjustment - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] It's frequently claimed that BC's are too cost effective. Compared to many other hulls, I'm inclined to agree. The price difference between a cruiser and a BC is that of a couple t2 guns. Sure the hull costs an extra 20M, but that's ensured so the... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.22 15:57:00
389. Navy issue battlecruisers - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Navy BC's are a sticky issue. I would like to see them added (ideally in both tier levels) but since ordinary BC's are already the most popular ship class (or so it seems) it's a hard case to make for adding improved ones. Fortunately I think this... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.22 11:51:00
390. FW among the top alliances in kills - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Interesting numbers, doesn't surprise me though. I should point out that we do fly a fair bit of shiny stuff floating around too. Navy issue and t2 ships are pretty much standard these days in FW. Perhaps not in BS class but certainly in frig/crui... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.22 11:28:00
391. Stop this Cloaky guy in my system! - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] 3/10, stupid and obvious but got a few bites regardless. - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.19 14:44:00
392. [Request] Tame the post eating forum monster - in Assembly Hall [original thread] The sad thing is the "old outdated forums" worked perfectly fine. This "new and improved" one gives endless error messages and devours posts. CTRL C and CTRL V are two things I hit before clicking post every time, even on ones as short as this. Th... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.19 11:24:00
393. Legion changes: A Christmas wishlist - in Ships and Modules [original thread] +1 to legion having too many mids and too few lows in most configurations. Also +1 to the lackluster offensive subsystems. It does half the dps of a proteus with the same basic fitting. My thoughts on the covert subystem is they should probably g... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.19 11:20:00
394. How about a little buff for Marauders... - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Goose99 wrote: King Rothgar wrote: I don't see many pirate faction BS's in pvp. Other than machariels, they really don't turn up that much. I was in a 70 man fleet last night and guess what, only one pirate faction BS was present (bhaalgorn)... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.19 00:38:00
395. How about a little buff for Marauders... - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I don't see many pirate faction BS's in pvp. Other than machariels, they really don't turn up that much. I was in a 70 man fleet last night and guess what, only one pirate faction BS was present (bhaalgorn). We had a fair number of navy BS's mixed... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.18 15:42:00
396. How about a little buff for Marauders... - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] t2 BS's do need a buff. Many argue against it but you just can't make a rational argument for t2 BS's being inferior to their t1 counterparts. The general buff marauders need is a proper t2 resistance bonus, increased sensor strength and increased... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.17 23:21:00
397. Level 3 , 4 and 5 misisons - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Several things since too many people don't know a troll when they see it. First of all, SoE doesn't have lvl5 agents in the first place nor do any of the other minor factions. Second, the LP/isk/loot difference between high sec and low sec isn't a... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.17 15:21:00
398. Anyone still use the CQ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Turned it off the day they added it, haven't been back since. Thinking of which, did they ever add the other 3 apartments? I want to say yes but I haven't actually looked. - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.16 19:12:00
399. Best overall tier 3 battlecruiser for PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] It's still a bit early to call it but I'm really leaning towards the naga. It can apply very heavy sustained dps at 100km+. It's pretty much in geddon/rokh territory for sniping but unlike those, it's quick and nimble too. Second goes to the torna... - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.16 19:08:00
400. Level 3 , 4 and 5 misisons - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Confirming SoE needs more high sec lvl5 agents. 5/10 if trolling, it's dumb, but you did make me laugh. - by King Rothgar - at 2011.12.16 19:02:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.