Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
1381. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Weaselior wrote: Also I wish to interject that large alliances beating up on small alliances is fun. While a few wet blankets may complain that all the fun is at their expense, the fun the large alliances have easil...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.13 08:26:00
|
1382. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: What I actually said was this was a change that purely benefits large alliances and since the illustration of the "dog-pile" mechanic has occured in reaction to wardecs from certain large alliances the nerfing of the all...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 23:53:00
|
1383. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You know, the more I think about it, the system needs to just be flipped on it's head. If "my furst merc corp" had to actually commit to an anti-GSF (or anyone) war then they would need to be convinced to do it, which would likely be in the sum o...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 23:34:00
|
1384. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: But really there is nothing there that breaks the system - just people playing games in the sandbox. Under the 1.1 system you could sign up a shell alliance as a free ally, then have 1-10,000 people join this alliance...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 23:23:00
|
1385. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Fuujin wrote: Finde learth wrote: And why unlimited free allies was dumb if Balance a fight never really been the goal in EVE ? Because its just idiotic on its face? Parity, equality, level fairness is not a g...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 23:01:00
|
1386. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: ... you also happen to be wrong in your presuppositions. I've never *once* heard "Hey guys, this screws over the fat cats. It's so unfair" in an...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:49:00
|
1387. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: The only people winning out in this change are small corps attacking small corps that were rapidly outnumbered by free allies. The only people losing out on this change are people who were looking to...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:48:00
|
1388. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: And one more time. I am saying that if you think these changes will boost the merc profession you are very wrong Actually, these changes are to stop it from harming the merc outfits, not necessarily boost them. We can ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:46:00
|
1389. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: ... you also happen to be wrong in your presuppositions. I've never *once* heard "Hey guys, this screws over the fat cats. It's so unfair" in any of the internal discussions whatsoever, and y...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:43:00
|
1390. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Two Step - Then push for some changes that revitalize the merc market without tossing a safety blanket over the large alliances. Can you do that?? It doesn't toss a safety blanket over large alliances, since they are a) not...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:41:00
|
1391. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: And who the hell is going to pay a proper merc's going rate for a wardec (1-2billion a week) to defend a nonsense dec from a 9000 man alliance that has to pay 50m a week for the pleasure of putting 1% into clown ships in...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:22:00
|
1392. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Question. Based on: Jade Constantine wrote: Its perfectly reasonable and a good game mechanic. Unfortunately it is not to the advantage of the large alliances so it won't even be considered and Quote: The system is being redesigned to nerf ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 22:15:00
|
1393. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Unless I'm overlooking some rule, it seems that there are indeed methods through which a defending alliance could take on as many willing participants as they can find, its just not *as easy* this way. There's no rul...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 21:51:00
|
1394. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
By the way, in the one or two instances where GSF actually acted on their wardecs (i.e. messing with Krixtal, etc) they numbered less than 20. Even in your edge case of a large entity going after a small corp there's simply not an issue that coul...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 21:46:00
|
1395. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Issler Dainze wrote: There are other small corporations that are also being wardec-ed by the goons, so more than just us two. I was contacted by one of them today, in fact. I agree that the ideal system will have to be good for the primary case...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 21:43:00
|
1396. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade, the major problem with your proposal is that the ONLY scenario in which it is a good idea is in YOUR situation. You don't see why people are writing it off as incredibly biased? Your original comments were a conspiracy fed "this has been ch...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 20:37:00
|
1397. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: We've been talking to some of the merc corps/alliances and having no meaningful choice in terms of picking a defender basically nullifies their business. What we wanted to ...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 20:05:00
|
1398. Unsub already - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Qvar Dar'Zanar wrote: StarVoyager Odunen wrote: , but unlike most EVE-UNI students we don't need a rigid intstructional system, and are able to synthesize information properly.. I wondered how long would it take for somebody to point at m...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.12 16:17:00
|
1399. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seleene wrote: I'm just mad posting a bit. I thought that's what this thread was about? Did I make error?! I dearly hope so.
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.11 20:24:00
|
1400. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Petrus Blackshell wrote: While everyone is having a field day with Jade's tinfoil hat, I've got another question about the wardec system: Is the director/CEO who declares a war still anonymous? Eliminating the voting period for wars was a goo...
- by Khanh'rhh - at 2012.06.11 19:48:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |