Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. In defence of AFK mining - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
masternerdguy wrote: Kestrix wrote: Eh what? Mining requires minimum player interaction regardless of my physical location in regards to the computer. I can sit and stare at the screen for 30 mins watching the pretty blue lasers and the dro...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.28 18:04:00
|
162. In defence of AFK mining - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bing Bangboom wrote: AFK mining is the entry drug to Botting. The New Halaima Code of Conduct, found at www.minerbumping.com , clearly explains why AFK mining is bad and therefore, forbidden by The Code. The miner who would afk is looking f...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.28 17:51:00
|
163. 5 Races is it that time.? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The sleepers could be built up into a new race... just a thought
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.28 17:35:00
|
164. In defence of AFK mining - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zol Interbottom wrote: I think we can see that AFK mining is the wrong way to play the game, it was never intended by the devs as one of the sandbox activities and should be removed poste haste, preferably by banning the perpetrators Please ...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.28 11:29:00
|
165. Low sec... Use it or lose it. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: NO. If you want to use low sec, then use it. What's stopping you? I use low sec as and when I need to. But we are not discussing just me here.
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.26 14:37:00
|
166. Low sec... Use it or lose it. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I've been wondering about low sec and how to make it more appealing to the more 'industrial' minded player. This is what I have come up with. I got the idea after seeing a pub with the sign up saying 'use it or lose it' Low sec systems would ha...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.26 09:36:00
|
167. NPC AI Adjustment: Does it solve anything? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
POKER ALICE wrote: Kestrix wrote: I've just recently bought and T2 fitted a Domi using sentry's and small drones as my primary DPS and I have yet to lose a drone to a level four mission. I have found that they get targeted more but that's no...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.26 07:49:00
|
168. NPC AI Adjustment: Does it solve anything? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've just recently bought and T2 fitted a Domi using sentry's and small drones as my primary DPS and I have yet to lose a drone to a level four mission. I have found that they get targeted more but that's not really a problem as the sentry's can b...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.12.26 06:53:00
|
169. You still going to play Eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We are doomed... DOOMED I say!
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.25 13:27:00
|
170. Mining with the new patch/new inventory - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I tried the new inventory, it took me a short while to get my head around it and now I love it. It's certainly not slowed me down. Nothing wrong with it as far as I'm concerned. A job well done by CCP.
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.23 09:08:00
|
171. New Probes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Their is already in eve technology that prevents a ship from cloaking. Ask any player that has a Faction standing lower than -5 if they can cloak whilst moving through that factions space. I would like to take this technology that prevents cloak...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.22 16:17:00
|
172. Putting the Kibosh on Ineptitude - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not eveyone is the same. Theirs a guy in my place of work, great guy but he's a bit slow to put it kindly, he needs constant supervision, but as long as someone is their to hold his hand he does a good job. Put him on eve and I'm quite sure he'll ...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.18 14:50:00
|
173. CEOs should be able to buy, sell, and trade members on contract - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote: This is actually not the stupidest thing the OP has posted. Hilmar and I think it's an interesting idea. I shudder to think of what he has posted before if this is not the stupidest the OP has posted.
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.18 05:32:00
|
174. In a world where Intellectual Property piracy doesn't exist... - in My EVE [original thread]
Piracy is a relatively small problem compared to the second hand sales industry. On the way home yesterday after work whilst walking along the main shopping street in my town I passed 4 stores selling second hand games, music, and movies and only ...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.16 05:16:00
|
175. How to never get suicide ganked again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fredfredbug4 wrote: Mine in a battleship. That is all. Given that even freighters are not immune from being ganked it is possible that your battle ship will be ganked. How ever I see this event as improbable, but don't quote me on that.
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.14 11:56:00
|
176. THORN Alliance resets everyone - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
PURE??? your a bit out of date there.
- by Kestrix - at 2012.05.02 17:39:00
|
177. Renaming "Carebears" to "Hardbears". - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
fgft Athonille wrote: carebears come in many vartieties dumbbears are the miners. there are way more profitable things for them to be doing but they mine nullbear. nullsec resident fwbear. farms fw lp all day robobear. bots Mining is not a...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.04.30 11:52:00
|
178. Renaming "Carebears" to "Hardbears". - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: Kestrix wrote: All these examples revolve around the current methods of non-consensual PvP. CCP has altered the workings of these after players found ways to obtaine results which CCP had not intended. The fact that 'carbe...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.04.30 06:33:00
|
179. Renaming "Carebears" to "Hardbears". - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: Kestrix wrote: And what forms of non-consensual PvP have their been? Apart from war dec's (which are being changed) The only other ways to engage in non-consensual PvP (In Empire) are to simply attack the target and accept...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.04.30 05:34:00
|
180. Renaming "Carebears" to "Hardbears". - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: Screw suicide ganking, it's a lost cause and only useful for the odd indie/hulk kill. Killing anything decent with suicide ganking is both boring and, usually, unprofitable. Its a stupid mechanic that has only become such a ...
- by Kestrix - at 2012.04.30 04:51:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |