EVE Search - Posts by Kelsin

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 449 for by author Kelsin (0,80 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
1. The Black Plan - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] May this bastion of freedom long roam the stars! - by Kelsin - at 2008.09.06 04:54:00
2. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] I very much agree - I think there was a high degree of burnout because the current process doesn't allow for compromise and revisions in order to make progress, it's more "throw it against the wall and see if it sticks" and that results in a lot o... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.25 23:49:00
3. [Look Brackets] Several Coordinated Ideas for 0.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: GulletSplitter I understand the implications of making moon mining more interruptable would break the current way alliances are controlling space. That being said I think that is part of the whole CCP idea...less capital shi... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.20 16:01:00
4. [Look Brackets] Several Coordinated Ideas for 0.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Bump for further discussion. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.19 12:01:00
5. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Toman Jerich Longass forum posts are all about the journey, not the destination. Truer words were never spoken. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 16:42:00
6. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] He included mention of it NanDe. I think you'd be stepping on a land mine by trying to legislate exactly how 0.0 should be more profitable when all you need to do is say "when implementing this, 0.0 profitability has to be balanced along with it".... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 15:33:00
7. What should change in the CSM? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] It just seems like there's some sense of issue fatigue based on the last chatlog. CSM members either don't care about or fail to read up on or discuss some topics, while other issues aren't clearly written or are too heavy on details to summarize.... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 14:44:00
8. [Look Brackets] Several Coordinated Ideas for 0.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread] A great consensus plan, I know the CSM has seen a few 0.0 related topics come their way, but this one was really hashed out from the ground up in Fahtim's thread. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 14:34:00
9. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Nice work everybody. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 14:34:00
10. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Edited by: Kelsin on 18/08/2008 11:44:21 That looks really good Toman. A couple academic points: You probably don't have to worry about fleshing out the details too too much, as long as there is a clear statement of what the balance intent is... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.18 11:43:00
11. Voting Apathy and Escaltion of issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] You guys are confusing me - didn't CCP get back to them and say that it takes 5 Yes votes to escalate, period? In that case an abstention is the same as a no, because it's withholding a Yes vote. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 15:10:00
12. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Edited by: Kelsin on 16/08/2008 15:04:46 Sounds good, I'll make some edits. EDIT: done. let me know if I missed anything. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 14:59:00
13. Streamlining the council for better communication with CCP. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Toman Jerich Is there anything regular joes ought to do in accordance with what you wrote? Is there some place where we can see the submission document formats you use? Nope, not at ... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 14:57:00
14. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] I think Fahtim can just post it when we're happy with it. The fact that it is a collaborative effort and we're all supporting it will help, and Toman can follow up with his FAQ. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 14:36:00
15. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] The economic model of moon-anchored POS should be re-examined with these changes to account for the potential disablement of facilities or theft of resources via raiding. The balance and risk of spreading industrial activity across a broad area, u... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 14:34:00
16. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Second Draft, adding some language about profitability in the face of potential raiding. Keeping it in broader terms is probably smart since CCP will be handling the exact nature of that sort of change. Recommended Changes to 0.0 This issue fo... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.16 14:33:00
17. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] That's a great point about the siege cycles. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.15 21:34:00
18. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] (didn't quite all fit) In addition, to provide for increased ability to stage forces in enemy systems prior to Sieges, a POS-caliber shield is recommended as a new module for the Titan, allowing it to temporarily create a safe zone in empty space... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.15 19:12:00
19. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] First draft, just trying to be concise and lay it all out there: Recommended Changes to 0.0 This issue focuses on three areas of changes to improve gameplay in 0.0 Sovereignty Warfare: 1) Improvements to Sovereignty Warfare Changing the Sov-c... - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.15 19:12:00
20. What determines Sovereignty? An examination of the concept. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Sounds good to me. I can whip up a draft we can start working on - something straightforward and not too heavy on details to start, and go from there to get something ready for the assembly hall. - by Kelsin - at 2008.08.15 18:11:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.