Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] |
381. Gallente getting bad ship design again or just plain ugly. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blue Pills are for Caldari babies; real Gallente bathe in Strong Mindflood boosters. We also drink our own bathwater
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.22 01:58:00
|
382. Sticky:New dev blog: In Development: Redesigning the EVE Rookie Ships - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Waitwaitwait, the wings on the Ibis can tuck in?
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.21 14:38:00
|
383. Eve online in "The picture of everything" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mind = blown. I like how the Thorax represents EVE; go go gallente!
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.20 16:55:00
|
384. Warp to 0 Auto-Pilot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Little known Eve-lore fact: submarines in space are a side effect of your ship's warp core. You'll find it right there somewhere in the lore-wiki.
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.19 02:39:00
|
385. The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ra Death wrote: I don't think it's an unreasonable question to ask since he is pretty much guarenteed election. He only has to satisfy GoonSwarm to get re-elected again next year. It's a simple question. Statistically speaking, more than 60...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.11 22:11:00
|
386. Faction medium blasters - what's the point in them? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is also the fact that Tech2 modules are less resistant to heat dammage from overheating; as such you can overheat faction guns for longer than you could the Tech2. Have you tried calculating the total dammage output difference between firei...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.11 19:10:00
|
387. The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Vordak Kallager wrote: If you test 0.0 mechanics on FW and Lowsec, you are going to get very different results and feedback than if you test them on the player base they are designed for. FW/Lowsec inhabitants and 0.0 inhabitants differ great...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.10 11:56:00
|
388. The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Cearain wrote: :words::words::words::words::words::words: and more :words: Mittens prefering to test 0.0 sov mechanics on FW, and Mittens (as the chairman) trying to push the CSM to advocate 0.0 sov mechanics to be tested on FW, are two e...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.09 20:21:00
|
389. The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
This place is less ~chill~ since Imryn started badposting; please GTFO and give me back my icicles before they melt!
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.02.09 13:48:00
|
390. [PROPOSAL] What happens in lowsec stays in lowsec GÇô Lowering the barrier to entr... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
+1 Briliant, and it might give ransoms in lowsec a breath of fresh air too. If nothing else, this idea needs the support of any/all candidates running for a lowsec CSM seat.
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.30 17:25:00
|
391. A better way to name things - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nova Fox wrote: Hmmm If i where a missile then FOX would stand for... hm... Fire on Xoss? Bump. Do a barrel roll?... Explosive barrel roll... Frack.
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.29 01:08:00
|
392. A better way to name things - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
According to the new missile names, OP is officially an explosive missile; approach and handle with optimistic caution. This thread cannot get enough +1s.
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.28 01:46:00
|
393. Sticky:New dev blog: Community events at Fanfest 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Through the stratosphere is an understatement, this party seems to be headed for the sun! Don't worry though, we all know suns harmlessly bump you away if you get too close
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.27 12:27:00
|
394. AF changes not quite what was needed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sigh... and then there was whine about changes that had absolutely zero negative impacts on an underused ship-class. The MWD bonus makes AFs useful as heavy tackle in fleet situations and makes them semi-viable kiting platforms (if you weren't af...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.26 10:19:00
|
395. Again changes to scanning and more fun to WHs mechanics? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's a conspiracy I tell you! Dude, chill, empire ain't goin' anywhere
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.26 00:22:00
|
396. T3 vs Tier 3 -- we need a convention - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why not just invert the two characters and use '3T'? For '3rd Tier'. "Did you see those 3rd Tier Battlecruiser stats?" "Yeah, the Tornado is the only good 3rd Tier Battlecruiser" "NERF 3rd Tier BCs!" I think it works, do you?
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.23 12:14:00
|
397. EXTREMELY rude player base - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akirei Scytale wrote: no need to egg people into attacking you in null. but if you get em typing, it buys time to probe em down. Pretty much this. Local smack has nothing but benefits for the user; you buy time to probe them, you get them ...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.22 17:38:00
|
398. Incursions: CCP is too slow - now we will act - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Since when does anyone need a reason to do whatever they want in EVE? It's all about perspective. I think this isn't as much about "we want carebears to move to 0.0, derp" as it is "FFS CCP, 600 billion ISK a week from hisec incursion faucets, wi...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.21 12:55:00
|
399. Incursions: CCP is too slow - now we will act - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
From what I understand, the issue of site farming bears less impact in lowsec and particularly 0.0. In lowsec, "farming" the incursion sites before killing the mothership is generally inadvisable due to the supposed 'risk' of interference from pi...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.21 12:22:00
|
400. Please add "cap level" to the watch list.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Renan Ruivo wrote: Yes, i got that part alright. And i agree. However its been said that doing the cap bar is harder than it might seem. Its new information for the server to handle. The broadcast option would be an aid while we can't have...
- by JamesCLK - at 2012.01.19 14:46:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |