| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
101. Minmatar MIlitia @ T5! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: Nice job minmatar. I was getting worried my minmatar mission alts would never be able to cash out all that lp. I didn't want to buy stabbers at tier 4 prices. Just admit it Cearain - I bet your minmatar alts are also runn...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 16:53:00
|
102. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: So many words in salute of inferno 1.0, the wardec mechanism release which would've caused more or less every wardec to be made mutual and get dogpiled into by every jita camping corp/alliance forever, for free, making the act o...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 16:50:00
|
103. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
*** Anyway. Today is the day the 1.1 Wardec Changes finally hit. And all our allies have now been cleared away by Concord/CCP intervention so its time to take stock and have a look at the results of the war. For the 5 week duration we've seen a...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 14:49:00
|
104. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: I'll take that as a "no", then. That didn't even make sense. I was asking you where the word "goonhate" comes from - and why you felt the need to coin a term for the opinion of people that don't like lazy fat dog-in-the-mange...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 14:20:00
|
105. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Would it make it easier for you to see through the goonhate What is "goonhate" exactly (leaving aside the rest of your predicable kneejerk "no you!!!" response, this is something I've seen a few of your players mention recen...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 14:04:00
|
106. Amarr Vs. Minmatar LP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lexmana wrote: sYnc Vir wrote: Zarnak Wulf wrote: Plexing against your own side is bad. Bragging about it is jaw dropping. I have 2.5 million in Amarr LP because I view tearing down the Minmatar LP store as a worthy war goal and dedicat...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 14:02:00
|
107. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: This is a rumor which Jade has initiated and played for all it's worth, even though it's false and has been debunked by CCP, the CSM and us, repeatedly. You still don't really see the humor in CCP,CSM "AND US" (meaning goons)...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.09 13:52:00
|
108. Minmatar MIlitia @ T5! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
chatgris wrote: Congrats guys - goon free too :) Hey I thought that was meant to be impossible!
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.08 23:12:00
|
109. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Being a "guerrilla-fighter" and an "underdog" isn't top of that list. Making you write entire essays in response when I'm not even talking to you definitely joins my list of accomplishments. Suffice to say I'm happy to be kn...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.08 23:11:00
|
110. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kyle Myr wrote: Jade, the reason he's calling you out for lying about moon money income is because you either are horribly misinformed, or deliberately copying misinformation. Nah, its mainly because he's butthurt-hopping-mad and just hurli...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.08 14:34:00
|
111. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: This thread? You mean the thread where I've bitchslapped you until you went from "I singlehandedly made goons whine to CCP until they changed the wardec mechanics" to "honda accord made goonswarm whine to CCP until they changed...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 17:13:00
|
112. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: New players are generall on the receiving end of wardecs, not on the giving side of wardecs. If they're on the giving side, they're on the aggressive side, and they'll have absolutely no problems coping with an increase of 48m ...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 15:33:00
|
113. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: 2m, 50m, it doesn't matter. A war'll cost a lot more than that, and you know this. It's a non-issue. I know nothing of the kind. If a new corp wants to throw t1 thrashers at a fat target the difference between 2-50m is 48 th...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 15:23:00
|
114. CCP: a question about FW for the forseeable furture - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lexmana wrote: you are outnumbered - like everybody else. And how many SFIs do you really need to take out a few T1 fit thrashers? And how many times have you seen me flying SFI's against your thrashers - usually I'm in a thrasher myself (o...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 15:20:00
|
115. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: 2m to 50m corp to corp is "25x", but nobody'll notice that minor difference. If they do, then they're extreme poors and couldn't afford a war anyways Its good of you to dismiss new players in small corps deciding to experie...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 15:16:00
|
116. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kyle Myr wrote: I disagree with you that Inferno 1.0 and 1.1 represent little or no progression on the empire war front. Pre 1.0, the issue of Dec-Shielding and wardec evasion was so prevalent that last November, it was ruled that dec shieldin...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 13:48:00
|
117. CCP: a question about FW for the forseeable furture - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lexmana wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: As I said to you earlier its kinda ridiculous to expect a situation in space that has amarr routinely outnumbering minmatar to lead to a situation where 80% of all systems remain in minmatar hands. H...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.07 13:21:00
|
118. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Varcutii Renalard wrote: What a thread to make a first eve-o forums post. To answer your question, i can see myself posting with an alt if i wanted to buy something atrociously costly in the Buy/Sell/Trade parts of the forum. I'm not particul...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.06 16:55:00
|
119. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: snipped a load more nonsense Well you've been asked to stop dragging this thread off-topic with your bad-posting "zim" - I suggest you do that. If you want to post a new topic to discuss how an in-character chat-channel cal...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.06 16:23:00
|
120. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: snipped evasive nonsense Answer the question I've been asking you for the last half dozen pages. "Does the "crackerjax site" represent an accurate picture of how the goonwiki site used to look at some point in the past?"...
- by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.06 14:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |