| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
381. I have returned! or I shot the statue but I did not shoot the deputy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Congratulation. You were the first to take action based upon information that had been retold so many times that it had only 1% validity left .. hope you spend as much energy, as you do trying to get people to stroke that infinitesimal ego of your...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.11 16:33:00
|
382. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: ...Another option is to use the heat system, but it's not hugely user-friendly and ends up with your reps being burnt out which is less cool. Which is kind of the point as we don't want active repair to remain viable as g...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.11 10:40:00
|
383. Active Armor Tanking - How do we make it viable? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
HP increases were added because population increase (and focused fire) made fights last seconds rather then minutes and has nothing whatsoever to do with active tanking. Since population has increased even further (times two at least) your suggest...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.11 10:17:00
|
384. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: ...The most obvious fix I can see is some method of boosting active tanking's burst repair potential without making it sustainable at those levels... You already introduced a boost+limiter when you added heat why not abus...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 18:32:00
|
385. Google search for eve online, first match lol. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just tried a bunch of permutations and your seriously scientific single test does not seem to be reproducible .. only by searching for "Eve + Isk" did I get the result you mention as #1. Failing at Eve is one thing, but failing at Googling .. do...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 17:31:00
|
386. THE LACK OF REASONS TO RAGE AT CCP CANNOT CONTINUE!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Joe SMASH wrote: The forum rage as of late is at an all time low. In fact, most of the posts are positive and cheering CCP on in making long needed changes.... You could always rage about how stupid your fellow players are ... The magnitude ...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 16:35:00
|
387. CCP Nerfed hisec RR aggression on the sly - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They are closing a loop-hole, not a nerf unless you are one of the let PvP'ers who can only fight by with 100% win chance or desire free loot with no effort. Don't you think that the fact they added a warning on module activation kind of gave the...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 15:55:00
|
388. CCP - I'm on my knees begging for an update on Factional Warfare - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Two step wrote: It looks like there will be some FW discussion at the upcoming CSM summit. We aren't sure yet what that means, but you are not (totally) forgotten... Allow me to provide you with the transcript ahead of time: "We have been rea...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 10:45:00
|
389. TEST Officially Declares War On Chribba - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tinfoil/Eternal Hope edition: The CSM has been given the chance to see what is being done to sort out the stagnant cesspool that is null sovereignty and by harmless NDA breaches TEST knows that they have until January to prove their relevancy (ie....
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.10 06:30:00
|
390. Sticky:New dev blog: Introducting the EVE Launcher - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You want to force a mandatory advertising platform in before any actual login step? Or is the login fields replaced by the progress bar and thus erroneously giving me the impression that you are embracing your inner uber-evil? If the former, the...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.09 19:28:00
|
391. Bringing Back The Snipers! :D - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yet the probe changes came at the same time as snipers were reduced to a novelty at best .. was that merely coincidence? Extending the minimum range to 200-250km is more than enough to allow snipers a place again, they'll still be probed down in ...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.09 15:25:00
|
392. 0.0 stalemate: how to make 0.0 dynamic - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
- Crippling costs associated with multi-region holdings. - Penalties for operating outside own sov. (US managed to bankrupt itself fighting abroad but ISK is crappy balancing tool so mechanic penalties are better). - Do away with EHP grinds for sy...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.09 09:52:00
|
393. Oracle - Capacitor and Damage Bonuses Again? Really? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
McRoll wrote: ..Large guns arent as problematic because they have tracking issues and that leaves smaller ships competitive. Besides I think its a very good idea because right now we have only one class of ships with oversized guns- stealth bom...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.09 09:39:00
|
394. Oracle - Capacitor and Damage Bonuses Again? Really? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They are doing what they always do .. a single brain-fart, in this case over-sized weapons, that gains tractions among the rank and file at the office and everything is thrown at the problem until the square peg fits the round hole. If they had b...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.09 07:31:00
|
395. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You are my alt in the minnie militia, I use you to kill me in cheapest high-value from market and cash in on insurance addendum. Same problem as increasing LP-for-Kills by enough to make a noticeable difference.
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 18:58:00
|
396. Ganker Math: Adapting to the Post-insurance nerf. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Telling high-sec "PvP'ers" that they fail at Eve, life and everything is NEVER a waste of time .. just sayin' PS: Already gave my input to the whole tier3 crap and since spamming is something only monkeys and ignorants do my work there is done.
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 11:00:00
|
397. Sticky:New dev blog: Starbase happy fun time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Increase block BPO material use, yield and hourly needs tenfold. Decrease block volume fivefold (benefits of single item far outweigh volume increase!). Gives you nicely malleable 10-20-40 units per hour to accommodate the various discounts for f...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 09:21:00
|
398. Ganker Math: Adapting to the Post-insurance nerf. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why don't you use a Maelstrom as the basis for your calculations as the primary objective is obviously to skew the data as much as possible in favour of your point of view? For a vast majority of scenarios you can cut a huge chunk off your calcula...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 08:42:00
|
399. Further Changes to High-Sec Aggression and Insurance Mechanics Requested - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: ...We, the industrial base and core players of EVE Online... I too am an industrialist who calls high-sec my home, but I have never heard of you nor from you so please edit your statement to reflect that it is on beha...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 07:48:00
|
400. If Eve goes Nerf, what is left? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the whole lets-hold-hands crap started, propagated and maintained by the null pvp'ers as a way to maximize income? Null has for the most part been a deep blue sea for going on five bloody years due to the care...
- by Hirana Yoshida - at 2011.11.08 07:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |