EVE Search - Posts by Hans Jagerblitzen

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1181-1200 of 2226 for by author Hans Jagerblitzen (0,48 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100
1181. Sticky:New Dev Blog: DUST 514 Closed Beta Signup Now Live - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Flamespar wrote: It will be interesting to see what sort of marketing campaign David comes up with. I quite liked the 'you're not in Azeroth anymore' approach he took to Rift's launch. I wonder if we'll see a similar tactic, where the marketin... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.30 05:12:00
1182. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Rel'k Bloodlor wrote: Their's some thing I want to ask. Dose any one have "fluff" and "lore" problems with the way things are in FW? Like that pie factions can make a harder and more complex (lol complex complexes) "space house" than our navy'... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.30 05:03:00
1183. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Hirana Yoshida wrote: Doubt many alliances have standings ready to go without shuffling some corps/characters. The delay is to be expected. I think the question to ask though is "are the mission incomes worth being locked out of half of h... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.28 19:41:00
1184. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Bad Messenger wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: [quote=BolsterBomb] I support this message, one thing we may want to fight off (depending on the community) is to prevent alliances (get rid of their patch for it) If we let 0.0 alliances in FW a... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 23:55:00
1185. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] [quote=BolsterBomb] I support this message, one thing we may want to fight off (depending on the community) is to prevent alliances (get rid of their patch for it) If we let 0.0 alliances in FW as we know it will go away. /quote] Well, "they're ... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 22:14:00
1186. A High Sec Manifesto - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Malcanis wrote: . A game with a player-driven narrative needs someone to step up and wear the black hat; cowboys'n'injuns is no fun if everyone's a cowboy and you have to persuade mom to be Cochise. I agree, and The Mittani certainly has don... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 19:06:00
1187. A High Sec Manifesto - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Alavaria Fera wrote: He woke up to the sound of alarms going off. An unmarked minmatar destroyer had just appeared in his belt. Moments more, several more popped up on his scanner as he slammed the warp button. As his mining ship began to acce... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 18:37:00
1188. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Very well put, Shaalira. I would agree that's a pretty accurate description of what we'd like to see and why we're concerned with the current direction of FW as laid out by CCP and the CSM. - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 16:40:00
1189. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Hirana Yoshida wrote: Well, CCP has already proven that specific bonuses/penalties can be applied in space without sov. present in the Incursion system .. only question is what would be a good idea. Ideas floated so far as my hastily deteriora... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 16:14:00
1190. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Don't worry, this thread isn't going anywhere. Our work is by no means done.... I think if anything its only resting a bit because of the heated discussions that flared up over in Warfare & Tactics that have temporarily held the focus of the ... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 15:10:00
1191. The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Plutonian wrote: Don't want to derail, but would like to address a comment: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: I don't really understand why someone would try to "go it alone" in an MMO when there are a host of great single players games offering be... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 09:57:00
1192. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] chatgris wrote: How do you propose we deliver said message? Working on that. More to come... Quote: (By the way, there's a handful of (ex)fw people here who will continue animosity no matter what, learn who they are and ignore them a... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 04:19:00
1193. Sticky:New Dev Blog: DUST 514 Closed Beta Signup Now Live - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Flamespar wrote: This is just a continuation of CCPs long tradition of poor communications. My feeling is that they are waiting until the discussions with Sony over microtransactions have concluded before starting the beta. Here's my su... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 00:43:00
1194. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Cearain wrote: As for me I am not even claiming to express the views of current fw participants. I am posting views of what would make fw worth doing, for me. I think that is fine, and likely what ccp wants to hear. And that's precisely... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.27 00:21:00
1195. Conflict Drivers in 0.0 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Hrodgar Ortal wrote: it was a oppressive regime so not really fitting within eve. Wait what? Did you just say there are no oppressive regimes in EvE? Just want to make sure I heard you correctly..... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 22:53:00
1196. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Bad Messenger wrote: You are not representing me or my opinions, you are just like Ankhesentapemkah. I've seen people like you before. you are not good for community and you are not representing majority of FW people. I have as much right to ... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 18:32:00
1197. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Garr Earthbender wrote: Don't apologize. FW missions are still easy mode for 1/2way skilled toons to make isk in low sec with no danger. Low sec DED missions have more risk than FW missions. Even if someone sees the FW mission up in a system, ... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 17:54:00
1198. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] BolsterBomb wrote: Just to let you know, being a single voice for the community does not mean putting your opinion ahead of the community. Your ideas about changing FW missions (to prevent a bomber from doing a mission) is completely inaccurat... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 16:57:00
1199. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Bad Messenger wrote: It seems that Hans keeps himself as some FW God who knows everything about it and how he is doing everything right. I doubt he even know who i am and what i have done in past in FW when he throws **** like that. Can you ... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 16:27:00
1200. CSM Minutes on Faction Warfare - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Super Chair wrote: Also, just to chime in to the above comment. FW missions have been devaluing and will continue to devalue. 200 million isk navy geddons? Caldari are lucky their navy scorpions haven't dropped that far yet. You greedy monst... - by Hans Jagerblitzen - at 2012.01.26 02:32:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.