EVE Search - Posts by Gypsio III

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 3981-4000 of 6189 for by author Gypsio III (7,39 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 [200] 300
3981. Powergrid Output suggestions - in Ships and Modules [original thread] A quick guide to the baffling world of missile nomenclature... Frigate-size launchers Rocket Launchers fire rockets. Makes sense... Standard Missile Launchers fire Light Missiles. Erm, okay... Cruiser-size launchers Assault Missile Launc... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.23 21:19:00
3982. Powergrid Output suggestions - in Ships and Modules [original thread] For L2 missions, fit Assault Missile Launchers instead of Heavy Missile Launchers. You'll do more damage to the little frigates, and your powergrid problems will disappear. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.23 17:16:00
3983. Combat simulator - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Gypsio III on 23/02/2009 13:24:19 I don't understand the outrage at this. It's riskless, but it's also rewardless. Nobody will use it instead of normal PVP because... what would be the point? The only objectional aspect would be s... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.23 13:21:00
3984. Moneymaking in EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Good ways of making ISK: Trading, manufacturing, invention. Bad ways of making ISK: Ratting, L4 missions. Terrible way of making ISK: Mining. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.23 09:31:00
3985. Best Caldari T3, Permaboost, 70-87 resists all around, 205 m/s 110km - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Edited by: Gypsio III on 22/02/2009 17:40:43 Originally by: Ms Brownstone I found the worst caldari T3 fitting combo Fixed. WTF is the point of a permaboosting, active-tanked ship with no mobility, feeble DPS and no tackle? - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.22 17:40:00
3986. Good Fleet PvP setup - Raven - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: NoNah Not a single passive targeter fit in a fleet raven thread? What's wrong with you people! We people know how passive targeters work and know that the trick you're thinking of doesn't work. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.22 16:06:00
3987. Drake PvP ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] And T1/CN HAMs hit webbed cruisers just fine. Fitting a painter on a HAM Drake is stupid. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.21 23:27:00
3988. Why the Nighthawk is sub-par ... thread number 4 billion this topic - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: Mendaar Lakschmi Edited by: Mendaar Lakschmi on 21/02/2009 10:12:33 wait... [Nighthawk, assaulttank] Power Diagnostic System II Damage Control II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Large ... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.21 11:04:00
3989. Drake PvP ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Originally by: Elite Qin If your Drake isn't passive, you aren't doing it right :P Lows: 4x Shield Power Relay IIs Med: 3x Shield Extender IIs 1x Kin Resist Amp II 1x Therm Resist Amp II 1x EM Resist Amp II High: Full rack of missile laun... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.20 15:55:00
3990. Why the Nighthawk is sub-par ... thread number 4 billion this topic - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: Archetype 66 Just look at the last Alliance tournament and we'll see if you say again NH isn't a PvP ship ^^ You see, the alliance tournament is a lot like PVP... OK, the force projection capabilities of a HM NH make it... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.20 11:14:00
3991. Caldari T3 subsystems - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Looks like you have the option to have Radar sensor type... that would be interesting to all those Falcons applying gravimetric jammers. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.19 19:56:00
3992. Drake PvP ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Edited by: Gypsio III on 19/02/2009 14:27:38 Originally by: Carniflex Originally by: The Tzar ORLY? Which BC's are better than the drake then for solo? High resists, circa 20K shield, 3 damage mods, light drones, point, web... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.19 14:23:00
3993. ITT: Crazy Broken Ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Typhoon CPU can be a bit tight, but that's all that I've noticed. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.18 16:11:00
3994. Boost Falcons!!!!! - in Ships and Modules [original thread] I soloed an unarmed salvage destroyer in a Falcon, but it took me over a minute to kill it! - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.18 13:00:00
3995. ITT: Crazy Broken Ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: 4THELULZ Edited by: 4THELULZ on 17/02/2009 19:28:31 Originally by: Gypsio III Let's make the Guristas ships proper Gall/Cal hybrids. Give them a proper split weapon system (e.g., 4/4 on the Rattlesnake), a decen... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.17 20:55:00
3996. ITT: Crazy Broken Ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread] All the Guristas ships need an overhaul tbh. Split weapon bonuses can make sense on certain ships, but the Guristas ships hardly even have a split weapon system - they just have this silly bonus and a spare turret hardpoint or two, but without the... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.17 15:44:00
3997. Eagle any good? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: Lurana Lay What some poster said before: the Eagle (and Cerb) are really good at doing jobs not much worth doing. In this thread, we have decided that shooting tacklers and Falcons is is "not much worth doing". Behold, t... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.16 09:05:00
3998. Why HAM instead of Heavy Missiles for PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Edited by: Gypsio III on 15/02/2009 19:58:11 Originally by: Rajere wrong, unless they're scrambled, 2x webbed, and painted. webbed battlecruisers yes. Nope. Run the missile damage formula and stop reciting clueless missile whinepo... - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.15 19:56:00
3999. Why HAM instead of Heavy Missiles for PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Edited by: Gypsio III on 15/02/2009 19:45:10 HAM damage against webbed cruisers and larger is unchanged. However, HMs did become much more viable in QR. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.15 19:44:00
4000. How to get rid of hi-sec griefers??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I think that the best way to get rid of high-sec griefers would to remove highsec. - by Gypsio III - at 2009.02.15 19:24:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 [200] 300
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.