Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
Dominus Alterai wrote: Frothgar wrote: If people hate the "Spawn distance" so much, what would people think of having "Warp distance" be substituted? EG, to collapse a WH you would have a default "Warp To" range based on Mass and a factor o...
- by Frothgar - at 2014.08.06 19:18:00
|
2. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
If people hate the "Spawn distance" so much, what would people think of having "Warp distance" be substituted? EG, to collapse a WH you would have a default "Warp To" range based on Mass and a factor of sensor strength unless.... you controlled y...
- by Frothgar - at 2014.08.06 18:48:00
|
3. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
Glasgow Dunlop wrote: If your going to do this with wormholes, why not jumpbridges and cynos as well? I'd like to see this as well ^_^
- by Frothgar - at 2014.08.06 15:38:00
|
4. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
As a 4 year WH resident, I love these changes. I see little to no risk involved in "Rage Rolling" as the responding party would have ~1-2minutes to respond to the presence of capitals cycling their WH. Which, unless they have a fleet actively Pv...
- by Frothgar - at 2014.08.06 15:37:00
|
5. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
I've lived almost exclusively in W space since its introduction and had multiple incarnations over the years. True story, one of the catalysts for VoC was after Aquila attacked my "Carebear Class" running Anoms in what became Volta's WH. The expe...
- by Frothgar - at 2014.03.24 20:13:00
|
6. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
^^^^^ Thats actually a pretty cool idea since it has a blob restricting cooldown.
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.21 16:41:00
|
7. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
First person going to Fanfest to ask/get a CCP comment about "Any thoughts about making battleships a more viable ship type in wormholes? Mass limits mean you can bring only 10ish of them if you want to come back home vs 100+ Tech 3 cruisers" I...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.20 16:29:00
|
8. Round table at Fanfest 2013 - in Wormholes [original thread]
First person to ask/get a CCP comment about "Any thoughts about making battleships a more viable ship type in wormholes? Mass limits mean you can bring only 10ish of them if you want to come back home vs 100+ Tech 3 cruisers" I'll give 250mil I...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.20 16:26:00
|
9. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
Oxandrolone wrote: Jack nailed it, BS's are not used in fleets because dreads murder them. They are nerfing dread tracking a little (through the tracking module nerf) so lets see what that does. I agree that dreads do murder BS, and that t...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.15 20:08:00
|
10. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
Jack Miton wrote: the issue with BSs in WHs is not really mass, it's that they get absolutely obliterated by dreads and T2/T3 cruiser fleets. note that this isnt a bad thing as such, just how it is. BSs are designed to shoot BC and larger targe...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.08 23:22:00
|
11. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
Maybe have the HIC bubble (reduces mass on the Hic when active) might be a good choice for bringing things through the WH. I would want to avoid making it possible to bring more caps through a WH though. Caps don't need any love in WH space.
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.08 21:28:00
|
12. Bring back the Battleship - in Wormholes [original thread]
While I don't have much if any interest in ingame politics, I do love internet spaceships. There are a number of fleets we tend to fly in WH space. The most common is the Tier3 BC and The Tech3 cruiser fleet. Both do their own thing, and do it w...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.04.08 20:12:00
|
13. WH Armor PVP Fleet - in Wormholes [original thread]
While we tend to roll large, we don't typically have a unified setup that everyone flies. The nice thing about T3s is the fits and subsystems vary in the individual ships. Example, you would likely have some proteus for points/scrams/dps, armor l...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.02.15 19:05:00
|
14. Dread blapping - in Wormholes [original thread]
Gary Bell wrote: And this is where the "tower" of win comes in and why you should always have some ****** phoenix.. Alright we fit to tank em.. seige green... Dammit here comes the nag I'll happily watch a nefarious plan of mine come undo...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.01.28 20:29:00
|
15. Dread blapping - in Wormholes [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Bane Nucleus wrote: People keep saying that the Moros needs a tracking nerf, but does that even matter when your target is essentially painted to the size of a battleship and NOT moving due to webs? *Keep in mind I do not fly d...
- by Frothgar - at 2013.01.28 18:36:00
|
16. You know you're a WH Bear if.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
When you put a Dreadnaught BPO set in ME research at an NPC station for over 2 years, and forget it ever existed because highsec is "Dead to you"
- by Frothgar - at 2012.09.28 18:35:00
|
17. You know you're a WH Bear if.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
When you decline to use a highsec exit 10j from Jita when you have only 2 weeks of fuel left, because you believe you're "Totally going to get one closer" by then.
- by Frothgar - at 2012.09.28 18:29:00
|
18. You know you're a WH Bear if.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
You think of the cost of most things in terms of "Number of sites run"
- by Frothgar - at 2012.09.25 01:20:00
|
19. Missile nerf and future sleeper ops - in Wormholes [original thread]
I'm excited to try the new missiles. I can't help but feel that HAMs + Tracking computers may end up being just as effective if not more than say Scorch HPLs. Explosion radius bonus for tracking speed scripts could potentially be huge and more eff...
- by Frothgar - at 2012.09.20 18:15:00
|
20. new POSes and wormholes - what do w-space dwellers need? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bane Nucleus wrote: Frothgar wrote: Gnaw, I don't think Lg POSes in C1s/C4s lead to conflict like perhaps they should. People tend to go for maximum safety, and if a slightly bigger corp "Moves in" the usual result is the smaller corp movi...
- by Frothgar - at 2012.08.14 20:38:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |