EVE Search - Posts by ElQuirko

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 41-60 of 1883 for by author ElQuirko (0,14 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
41. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ramona McCandless wrote: ElQuirko wrote: Ramona McCandless wrote: ElQuirko wrote: Rousing and informative speech Complete sense Your gore posts were funnier Thank you :) I try to appeal... not wait.. I try to put off as many... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.10 16:54:00
42. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ramona McCandless wrote: ElQuirko wrote: BORING WORDS NONSENSICAL GIBBERISH Your gore posts were funnier - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.10 16:49:00
43. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ramona McCandless wrote: Pretty sure they were On Saturday, 11 November 2006, White Wolf and CCP Games, the Icelandic MMO development company responsible for EVE Online, announced a merger between the two companies during the keynote address a... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.10 16:04:00
44. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tiber Ibis wrote: How about just making T3s flexible ships as CCP currently have planned. No one has been asking for transformers in space. Yeah no, a fair few of us actually have. It's the only way the "flexible" role of the T3s can actual... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.10 16:01:00
45. Is CCP going to stop throwing money at nerd events and buy some real servers for... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] YEAH CCP, YOU GUYS ARE SO LAZY AND AWFUL, YOU CAN TAKE YOUR UNIQUE AND REVOLUTIONARY PRODUCT AND SHOVE IT. - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.10 15:54:00
46. CCP - Observe Your Audience's Emotional Involvement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I didn't actually read it but I saw "stupid green navy megas" and +1d. - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 16:59:00
47. For the love of all that is turtle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] This thread is going over the rainbow and far, faaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrr away. - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 15:17:00
48. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: I'm merely pointing out that, no, T3s do not cost 1bn+ to fit (or, if they do then so do T2s so it makes no difference either way), nor do they cost four times as much as a T2 ship, and that no matter what you fly, bad fits makes... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 14:38:00
49. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Riot Girl wrote: Mr Kidd wrote: Yeah, because at +1bil for a fit ship doing two jobs, you could have 2 ships at half the cost doing each of those jobs with twice the tank/dps. And when you die in a ball of fire flying that a... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 13:58:00
50. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: ElQuirko wrote: While I agree it would be lovely to see the properly protean T3s, it seems futile to lessen the power of the T3 ships without giving them some sort of in-space purpose-changing function. No it makes perfect ... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 12:43:00
51. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Lexmana wrote: But it is better .. at generalisation meaning flexible. It is like a swiss army knife and very useful if there are constraints on how much you can take with you. But you are almost always better off bringing a real pair of scisso... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 12:00:00
52. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: What does that have to do with ship balance? Doesn't. But the point is they're not nearly as expendable as T2, thus they're not nearly as commonplace in combat unless the combatants using the T3s are guaranteed a victory, h... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:59:00
53. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: Quote: The laser-Legion is totally outclassed by the Zealot Not at all. Eerm, yes, it is. Go on out and find me a legion fit with lasers that is as pragmatic and powerful as the Zealot or ONI. Quote: T3s are yet... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:57:00
54. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: Cost is irrelevant to balance. Is it not? Feel free to go out into lowsec in your supposedly OP T3. You should easily be able to kill everything right? Risk-free PVP, totally. Quote: Which areas? Proteus moves slow... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:51:00
55. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sanadras Riahn wrote: In a game of role-based combat, having a ship that can fill multiple roles is a huge boon. Right now, T3s are OP. If they brought them back in line to, say, be able to fill two roles at once , and did just as well as some... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:47:00
56. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: Well I'll be happy to see the change. PvP will be much better when there are 12 great combat cruisers to choose from instead of just one. ElQuirko wrote: Eerm no, check the requirements next time you log in? The Proteus re... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:44:00
57. CCP: Fix the *** overview bug - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Mmmmh, I've been waiting a while to say this. Have you considered filing a... petition ? Why does you being affected by this issue give you priority? Are you a special snowflake ? Suck it up and press F12 buddy. Or have you considered red... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:32:00
58. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: Why does it matter? If you can fly a T3, you can fly a HAC. Eerm no, check the requirements next time you log in? The Proteus requires neither Weapon Upgrades V nor Energy Grid Upgrades V, for example. As for the OP: Tom G... - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.09 10:25:00
59. New targeting animation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Wow this didn't come up for like a month and now two threads today. Impressive. - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.08 21:17:00
60. Would muting the Jita local improve the situation ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Keep them in there for containment purposes. Rens, Amarr, Dodixie and Hek are all lovely without the spambots that Jita contains. They'd just move if Jita was muted. - by ElQuirko - at 2013.06.08 15:43:00
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.