Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Research POses & out of corp chars - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Abdiel Kavash wrote: Supporting opening a POS, charging for research, and taking the POS down. hehe, nice :D
- by Denidil - at 2011.09.13 01:16:00
|
2. [Proposal] Lowsec "control points" - focused pvp objectives - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Laechyd Eldgorn wrote: no because it sounds like arena pvp which is awful other than that you can always go militia just trying to come up with a way to prevent blobbing and encourage pvp. it's not like pvp wouldn't happen elsewhere. do ...
- by Denidil - at 2011.09.08 18:03:00
|
3. [Proposal] Lowsec "control points" - focused pvp objectives - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
So over in general we were talking about appeal to new players and it occurred to that a system that would encourage fast, balanced, pvp would help the game immensely. at first i had no idea what we could do. then it hit me. "Control Points". Ea...
- by Denidil - at 2011.09.08 17:00:00
|
4. [Proposal] I should be allowed to mission in peace! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
-1, fack off troll.
- by Denidil - at 2011.09.08 16:46:00
|
5. Research POses & out of corp chars - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
are we ever going to be able to contract out access to a POS's research arrays to non-corp/alliance chars?
- by Denidil - at 2011.09.07 15:58:00
|
6. [CROWD SOURCE] Microtransactions - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
cosmetic only
- by Denidil - at 2010.10.08 02:46:00
|
7. [proposal] No trading Plex's for Neural Remapping - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
WTF CCP? NO!
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.20 22:46:00
|
8. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Theel Maas Would rather see a T3 ship that can fulfill multiple industrial roles. If current proposals aren't good, improve them. I don't think we need any more static sub-capital ships. T3 ftw t3 = target t3 = ass rapin...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.11 12:37:00
|
9. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: EdwardNardella After reading only the OP I must say I really like this idea... As long as the ship costs is significant (somewhere between T2 BS and Tier 3 BS) More juicy targets! well it would be a tech 2 ship, so i'd m...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.10 02:52:00
|
10. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Uriel Winston t3 barge no onjections but you cant have BS TANK and hulk efficiency, thats damn OP. first i proposed a battlecruiser sized tank, battleship size second how is tanking ability, with no appreciable offens...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.07 22:20:00
|
11. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
my hulk pilot, only with Exhumers IV, gets around 1800/minute.. but that's with T2 mining drones deployed as well and a +3% implant
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.07 12:12:00
|
12. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Otocinclus CCP won't do anything that makes it easier for you to play eve as a single player game. Cooperation is rewarded, stop victimising yourself by playing alone and you'll figure out that you'll do a lot better. ...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.07 03:10:00
|
13. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Denidil on 06/09/2010 22:09:23 Originally by: darius mclever 1. a proper fit hulk can already tank 0.0 belt rats i'm well aware of this, i have a hulk that can tank 3x guristas BSes and the tank costs less than the hull...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.06 22:09:00
|
14. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Consumption Technician Edited by: Consumption Technician on 06/09/2010 17:02:31 I like the idea of a heavy-tanking exhumer with an ore bay for null/low, but there needs to a tradeoff between survivability and mining yiel...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.06 17:23:00
|
15. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
well true that is a touch OP on the drone bay. 125Mbit w/ 150m3 would be more than plenty.
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.05 23:26:00
|
16. Idea: Battleship sized exhumer (cannot mine faster than a hulk!) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
so for us 0.0 mongers one of my corp mates had an idea Battleship sized exhumer. 200% Bonus to Survey scanner and Strip Miner Range, can mount 3 strip miners but has 1 or 2 extra high slots, lows/mids to fit a roughly drake-sized tank. prohibitio...
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.05 22:51:00
|
17. One Button Extractors - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
sup
- by Denidil - at 2010.09.05 22:15:00
|
18. [Proposal] High sec asteroid changes, Mining Barge/Exhumer tweek - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
more comments pls.
- by Denidil - at 2010.08.15 16:34:00
|
19. [Proposal] Changes to Concord - distress call - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
no
- by Denidil - at 2010.08.15 16:27:00
|
20. [Proposal] Industrials and hostiles - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
no because your two proposals are so freaking ******ed, unbalanced and embodiment of the stereotype of the whiny carebear that we think you're trolling us. so either you're ******ed, or you're trying to get a rise out of us. consider it a complim...
- by Denidil - at 2010.08.15 12:48:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |