Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
121. Forgotten features? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nana Skalski wrote: They forgot to add WiS like they showed it here. WiS is so far past dead its already so decomposed even its bones turned to dust :P
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.31 12:27:37
|
122. Forgotten features? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: Ambulation aka Wis and being able to take over planets and Titans and stuff with dust 514. You do know dust was completely cancelled a fair while back, the game no longer exists, the dust related features died with it
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.31 12:25:47
|
123. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: C) This just applies a delay to standing/access changes to involve some form of commitment, rather than being as easy as a few clicks in a few seconds to force someone to wait 5 days for their assets to be accessible. ...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.31 10:21:03
|
124. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wanda Fayne wrote: baltec1 wrote: Wanda Fayne wrote: Hevymetal wrote: My humble advice for what it's worth is check your docking rights to the station in question BEFORE accepting the contract. Logical answer. +1 But it won't p...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.31 10:05:29
|
125. Forgotten features? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mark O'Helm wrote: Please post here your favourite promised features that never came or have not been mentioned by CCP since a long time. I will start. -Shield HP implants -3 minutes warp timer Shield implants were mentioned at fanfest an...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.31 09:08:28
|
126. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Cypherous wrote: The discussion is looking good so far, i just want to make sure the exploration voice is heard loud and clear, while cloaky nullified T3's are a pain for PvP they are important for explorers, i'm open for p...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 16:10:36
|
127. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The discussion is looking good so far, i just want to make sure the exploration voice is heard loud and clear, while cloaky nullified T3's are a pain for PvP they are important for explorers, i'm open for penalties that would affect PvP while havi...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 16:02:07
|
128. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: A) Improving the Contract spreadsheet UI with sortable pickup/delivery structure type columns has two effects: --1) Clued players can easier sort the interface to avoid certain structures, which is available info anyways. -...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 14:39:56
|
129. How long does it take to release implants? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
hellokittyonline wrote: As usual I'm pretty disappointed in CCP. All this focus on player owned stations that in the grand scheme of things only serve to remove more content from the game (oh now we can have SO much fun shooting a static struct...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 13:21:34
|
130. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: 8 - Not only are you arguing by authority, which is already a logical fallacy, my oldest character is nearly 10 years old. Even though it does not matter in the slightest to any logical debate other than prove how badly constru...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 13:15:33
|
131. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rising Rider wrote: ModusOperandi wrote: What will happen to the Strategic Cruiser skills? I have them injected, but not trained. I guess training them now would be a bad idea? I don't think anyone (from the players side) in here can give...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 13:02:32
|
132. Does ccp intend to replace all stations with citadels or just sov nu... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kathern Aurilen wrote: Do Little wrote: Conquerable stations are being upgraded to faction citadels the same time as Outposts. At that point, stargates will be the only non-destructible infrastructure in sovereign nullsec. NPC stations are ...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.30 12:56:58
|
133. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Cypherous wrote: Coralas wrote: Cypherous wrote: Coralas wrote: No I'm not confusing anything. This post however makes no sense whatsoever. Its not a problem for a GM to take isk back from a scammer regardless o...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 19:24:53
|
134. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: Cypherous wrote: Coralas wrote: No I'm not confusing anything. This post however makes no sense whatsoever. Its not a problem for a GM to take isk back from a scammer regardless of what you think is a plausible denial. Th...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 15:41:00
|
135. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Arkoth 24 wrote: Reducing the number of subsystems is a bad idea. When you try to make game "more simple" Star Wars Galaxies happens. Hardly, they are being reduced because some of them are just flat out worthless and the engineering and ele...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 15:34:03
|
136. WHAT HAPPENED TO PLYER OWNED CITADEL??????????????????? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hir Miriel wrote: I never much like how moderation of topics, like possible locks, becomes the topic people post about when the topic of the post is pretty interesting. Capitals aren't hard to read and evoke no emotion in me at all; complaini...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 11:00:07
|
137. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: No I'm not confusing anything. This post however makes no sense whatsoever. Its not a problem for a GM to take isk back from a scammer regardless of what you think is a plausible denial. They are undoing 10 minutes of player wo...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 10:25:21
|
138. Magic Plex Vault - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blade Darth wrote: "careful consideration and close monitoring of the market" They noticed price jump by 20% in 3 days and hit the "oh sh*t" button XD The price increase was expected and fairly normal for EVE, there was no panic, they didn't...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 10:20:52
|
139. Plex Pieces - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: ISD Max Trix wrote: This has come up before and to paraphrase what CCP has said on the topic, it is unlikely if ever something like this would be implemented. Personaly, I would not want this to happen. This is b...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 10:16:32
|
140. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: I hate these exclusive little Focus groups that just excludes everyone else.. isn't there already a csm for that? removable rigs ... at 60 mil a pop for a set of T2 rigs.. does that really encourage versatility? T3's need s...
- by Cypherous - at 2017.05.29 09:52:27
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |