Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
101. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JigglyKnockers wrote: If low sec doesn't suck anymore, then why does it need a buff? More Straw Men Arguments. This isn't about boosting Low Sec. It's about offsetting the ease of life in High Sec with higher taxes to instigate more oppor...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.02 20:38:00
|
102. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JigglyKnockers wrote: Everyone always keeps talking about how CCP needs to nerf high sec to get the bears to move out to low or null. The problem is that it isn't going to work. They will just stay in high sec b/c of a variety of reasons. How a...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.02 20:34:00
|
103. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: on the serious note.... i was thinking about this idea about taxes and stuff.... Let's say: me is carebear. I need to buy and fit new carebearmobile. This would be about 300 millions (yes, i'm cheap scrub). Ok. So we got ...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.02 20:11:00
|
104. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think you're underestimating the power of the 1%.
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.02 15:24:00
|
105. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Bloodpetal wrote: The notion that industrialists and Pirates / PVPers won't work together is dumb. They constantly use each other. The reason you don't believe it happens is because Pirates want targets and they're...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.01 22:08:00
|
106. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The notion that industrialists and Pirates / PVPers won't work together is dumb. They constantly use each other. The reason you don't believe it happens is because Pirates want targets and they're not working with "you" when they shoot you. You...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.01 16:13:00
|
107. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Uprising - Shaping New Eden's Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Zulu wrote: Balmer Banshot wrote: Worst dev blog ever. You should see some of my other work. We talking about Jeans again?
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.03.01 15:28:00
|
108. Have Capsuleers forgotten their heritage? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: Siigari Kitawa wrote: Eve isn't about time, it's about ADVANTAGES. I think this is why people get so upset about "blob" warfare. You've spent years training skills, learning the game, pimp fitting your ride... you think ...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.28 15:28:00
|
109. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Any other thoughts?
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.27 03:52:00
|
110. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you look at the kind of trade hubs that exist, there are basically 4 classes : Mega Trade Hub == Jita, Assets from 20T ISK and higher Major Trade Hub == Assets from 1T- 5T ISK . (i.e. Jita, Amarr, Dodixie, Rens, Hek) Minor Trade Hub == Asset...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 22:18:00
|
111. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Again, it's not about making everyone leave high sec. It's about giving an incentive to Low Sec. If you convert 1 in 20 traders to doing more low sec trading to be competitive, they will dramatically change the face of Low Sec. Yes, so some peopl...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 22:03:00
|
112. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: I agree with both in my own way. Tax High Sec more, to offbalance the massive benefits of high sec. People won't leave high sec for a few %. Your change will have only 1 benefit and thats burning ISK from the game slo...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 20:27:00
|
113. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The CCP Economist suggested raising taxes as a solution for inflation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=7MZD6-vGQms CCP Soundwave, the game designer, is trying to avoid doing it. I agree with both in my own way. T...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 19:14:00
|
114. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abrazzar wrote: baltec1 wrote: Abrazzar wrote: Nerfing highsec does not make lowsec a better place. Only when lowsec (and nullsec) become viable on their own terms, balancing them with highsec becomes feasible. Until then, it's just a sq...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 17:16:00
|
115. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What "sucks" is that High Sec has many advantages with no penalties. Raising taxes to, let's say, 2% is hardly breaking high sec. The Accounting Skill and Corporate standings can lower the taxes back down to 1% very easily. You're basically get...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 16:51:00
|
116. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abrazzar wrote: Why not just move highsec to its own shard and leave low and nullsec as a hardcore PvP server? At least then people will no longer feel compelled to post the same **** over and over again while the same people have over pages a...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 16:30:00
|
117. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ares Farway wrote: SO I have to sit in a low sec station to install my region wise buy orders and have an alt collect em? Same safety for me once I am there, and Jump clones are gonna be my best friend then :) Go for it. You'd still be promo...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 16:24:00
|
118. Simple rebalance of Empire security ratings - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
High security offers a wide variety of "advantages" and perks over Low Security. CONCORD, safer travel, no infrastructure burdens, etc. How do the Empires "pay" for this, in theory? Taxes. Then why is Low Sec, who gets a lot less infrastructure "...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 16:11:00
|
119. Why are butt pirates butt pirates? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The world is in a constant state of "Anarchy", it's just mitigated by the actions of some to chose to cooperate. Whether or not they are conscious of this "Social Contract" ever existing in the first place. You are simply trained to be a good ...
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 15:46:00
|
120. 4000 logins away from pcu record! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Curious question... Does PCU count Dust players currently? No idea if it does.
- by Bloodpetal - at 2013.02.25 15:37:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |