Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:Dev Blog: Holiday Dev Incursion! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Is it Rancer? It's Rancer isn't it. Oh please let it be Rancer.
- by Berendas - at 2012.12.07 13:57:00
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Please tell me that MJD's are still only usable on battleships
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.14 23:13:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Upon thinking about the Ferox and the proposed changes, I would be much in favor of turning it into a mid-range kiter. You can't really make it into a sniper without competing with, and losing to the Naga, and you can't really make it a blaster br...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.07 17:08:00
|
4. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Raziel Tyrael wrote: Also, not to mention CPP wise that lots of people would sell their OGB characters and discontinued running that accounts. The same sort of worries surrounded the Falcon nerf but it had to be done anyway. Long term game b...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.07 01:27:00
|
5. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: Berendas wrote: Tarra Nobilii wrote: Prophecy: expected to be changed to a drone boat. This is a role revamp that will radically modify its slot and fitting layout. It will most likely have less bandwidth but more drone ba...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.07 01:02:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Intex Encapor wrote: sad to see how they want to reduce the most versatile bs to some khanid wannabe. sure it requires many skills to max out, but its perfectly fine on each subset of skills too :/ eve really needs more of those ships, not l...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.07 00:30:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tarra Nobilii wrote: Prophecy: expected to be changed to a drone boat. This is a role revamp that will radically modify its slot and fitting layout. It will most likely have less bandwidth but more drone bay than the Myrmidon. On top of being ...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.06 23:21:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sizeof Void wrote: Perhaps this has been asked and answered already (in which case, I apologize to everyone): Looking even further in the future, is it likely - or even just possible - that T2 ships will be given the same racial skill treatmen...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.06 22:38:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
For my part, the BC and BS changes look stellar and there isn't much I would have differently... Except for the changes to the Typhoon. I would hate to see the hyper-versatility it offers disappear. The Typhoon embodies what it is to be Minmatar, ...
- by Berendas - at 2012.11.06 21:09:00
|
10. Sticky:New dev blog: Candidacy period for CSM7 to open soon! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
WTB low sec candidate
- by Berendas - at 2012.01.25 18:29:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Daedalus Arcova wrote: All these one-line posters going 'Woo!! Thanks CCP! This is awesome!' are going to feel pretty let down when they realise these tweaks basically change nothing. CCP, this is really disappointing. When the Chaos stats wer...
- by Berendas - at 2011.11.01 21:36:00
|
12. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
These buffs are minor at best . Gallente ships are still going to be way too slow and vulnerable to take advantage of hybrids (which will still suck anyway). CCP better make some bigger changes than this meager bone they are throwing us.
- by Berendas - at 2011.11.01 07:07:00
|
13. Eve Online Dominion 1.1 Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Still not bringing back that afterburner bonus to assault frigates? That's really disappointing CCP
- by Berendas - at 2010.01.21 04:31:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |