EVE Search - Posts by Bagehi

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 21-40 of 1941 for by author Bagehi (0,30 seconds)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
21. Unofficial Fanfest EVE Nametags! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I would like a name tag for Fan Fest please! - by Bagehi - at 2013.04.04 14:58:00
22. Sticky:[Odyssey] Attack Battlecruiser balance pass - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Michael Harari wrote: Bagehi wrote: Michael Harari wrote: Dysphonia Fera wrote: Is your argument that because people fly it, it needs nerfing? And that battlecruisers can kill cruisers? Well hot damn son, colour me shocked. Im sayi... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.28 14:43:00
23. Sticky:[Odyssey] Attack Battlecruiser balance pass - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Michael Harari wrote: Dysphonia Fera wrote: Is your argument that because people fly it, it needs nerfing? And that battlecruisers can kill cruisers? Well hot damn son, colour me shocked. Im saying people fly them because they are overpo... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.28 14:38:00
24. Sticky:[Odyssey] Attack Battlecruiser balance pass - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Michael Harari wrote: Dysphonia Fera wrote: Michael Harari wrote: Dysphonia Fera wrote: Michael Harari wrote: Here is an idea: Just stop the ships from fitting the large long range weapon systems. That is a bad idea Why? The ma... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.28 14:33:00
25. Sticky:[Odyssey] Attack Battlecruiser balance pass - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] CCP Rise wrote: Grath, I'm not sure exactly what you mean about making room for the other BCs more. I feel like for the most part like combat BC have a very different role than attack BC, so one doesn't really tread hard on the other. Thats not... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.28 13:47:00
26. We want your opinion! All-time great tournament teams! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread] Buhhdust Princess wrote: I cant remember the year, but when Voltron released a deadly wave of bombs with perfect timing, and then proceeded to mop up. But i'm slightly biased ^^ That was probably the most memorable match in the AT - youtube . - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.19 15:29:00
27. We want your opinion! All-time great tournament teams! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread] Winners of Alliance Tournament VI, VII, and VIII: Pandemic Legion. ATVIII was the most entertaining finale in my opinion. - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.19 15:12:00
28. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Hakan MacTrew wrote: Bagehi wrote: Rolling out a collection of tier 2 dreads with the alternate weapon system for each race would likely even things up with the tank preferences for cap fleets. That would work great for Caldari and Minmata... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.12 18:53:00
29. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] De'Veldrin wrote: Gypsio III wrote: De'Veldrin wrote: Caius Sivaris wrote: Will you reimburse the SP I sunk in Citadel torps and cruise missiles? I basically love the rebalance work, but I hate the impact on my SPs. The BC skill chang... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 18:34:00
30. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Weasel Juice wrote: Bagehi wrote: Also, Revelation has a 40% advantage over the Moros in optimal range. It is slightly tempered by the 18% decrease in falloff, but that is a rather impressive range advantage. Vincent Gaines wrote: Siege... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 18:14:00
31. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Oode22 wrote: Bagehi wrote: Rolling out a collection of tier 2 dreads with the alternate weapon system for each race would likely even things up with the tank preferences for cap fleets. Good Idea man, they could do hybrids for caldari; ... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 18:06:00
32. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Weasel Juice wrote: Bagehi wrote: [quote=AyayaPanda] Moros does more damage, Revelation doesn't use ammo. Rev also has better base resists, so you can sacrifice a tank mod for a cap mod, leaving you with a ship that can exit siege, after sho... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 16:00:00
33. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Reppyk wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: I'll start us off with the Nag change. Many of you know that in the past CCP has expressed a desire to remove the outdated and very annoying split weapon systems on the Naglfar Dreadnaught, but that fitting a ... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 15:52:00
34. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] CCP Fozzie wrote: Going to requote one paragraph from the OP that is important, even while apologizing for the fact that it is necessarily vague at this time. Quote: Some of you will notice that there are certain imbalances that these chang... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 14:59:00
35. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] AyayaPanda wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Yes to the double damage bonus, the skill bonuses are not changing. As for the utility high, we think the ship will be quite competitive with the three highs and the damage bonus. We did consider leavin... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 14:56:00
36. [Summer] T1 Frigate Polish Pass and Naglfar fix - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Hashi Lebwohl wrote: For the Naglfar could you consider biasing the armor/shields towards armor and/or adding an additional low slot. I ask this because it cannot have escaped your notice that shield capitals in pvp are on the verge of going ... - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 14:41:00
37. New Noble exchange stuff - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] This thread will likely end no better. If you want to play furry barbies, there are other games out there for that. Eve isn't one of them. - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.11 01:13:00
38. I am a Furry... and D@#% proud of it too!!! - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] We don't have silly DLC hats and leopard print Megathrons either and you want fuzzy tails and cat ears for your closet-sized CQ? Go back to SL. Also, X. - by Bagehi - at 2013.03.10 23:53:00
39. Sticky:Dev blog: Fleet interface and other improvements in Retribution 1.1 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] theDisto wrote: While you are working on the fleet interface, are there any plans to make the whole hierarchy tree selectable and therefore copyable into external applications? Currently you can only copy a single line at a time unlike directio... - by Bagehi - at 2013.02.18 17:22:00
40. Dev Blog: No Brakes - Ship Balancing in Retribution 1.1 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Happy Valentine's Day to you Fozzie! Where do we send the chocolates for all these ship balance changes? - by Bagehi - at 2013.02.14 16:38:00
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.