EVE Search - Posts by Andski

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 781-800 of 6707 for by author Andski (0,81 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300
781. Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Dante Uisen wrote: Andski wrote: i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable destruction of this game Are you ... - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 19:43:00
782. Mining ships and EVE design philosophy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] that's not an ad hominem - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 19:36:00
783. Mining ships and EVE design philosophy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] see one of my previous posts in this thread - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 18:46:00
784. Mining ships and EVE design philosophy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] none of the mining ships can hold their own in 0.0 in any way shape or form because a tank alone is not sufficient in the actual sandbox - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 18:29:00
785. Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable ways that are destructive to this game - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 17:03:00
786. Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] other examples of outrageous ideas accepted as fact by these types: anchoring a tower under another alliance's sovereignty is impossible nullsec alliances routinely cynojam ratting systems alliances keep supercapital caches on holding characters,... - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 16:18:00
787. Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] hisec wretches will always make hilarious attempts to speak authoritatively on things relating to space they've never set foot in, basing their opinions entirely on hyperbolic hearsay based on more hyperbolic hearsay for example, many of those hi... - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 15:44:00
788. Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: ITT: EVE-UNI and NPC corp posters think BPCs valued by players at 900M a piece are a regular and plentiful source of income i'd really like to see them keep sounding off with their hilarious ideas on how nullsec wor... - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 15:39:00
789. What would happen if CCP eliminated SOV? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] then control would be implicit rather than explicit - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 11:38:00
790. Mining ships and EVE design philosophy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] notice the vast difference in the literacy levels between those saying "yeah, no, barge pilots should make a choice too" and those saying "no we can't be bothered to learn anything beyond running our mining macros" - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 09:36:00
791. Mining ships and EVE design philosophy. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] wretched afk miners and botters can't be asked to make choices in their fits it is unsurprising, then, that these afk miners and botters are so opposed to putting mining ships in line with other ships - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 09:33:00
792. Are alts required? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Quit Whining wrote: Try moving capitals solo or owning a Super without any alts... what kind of peasant moves his own cynos - by Andski - at 2013.02.17 03:33:00
793. Why are major corps leaving their alliances all of a sudden? (ie dreddit, etc) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] blame the API - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 18:44:00
794. Why are major corps leaving their alliances all of a sudden? (ie dreddit, etc) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Mai Khumm wrote: They're getting tired of Alliance overlords RMTing all the ISK and not giving them a cut... TNT - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 18:44:00
795. No Local - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] also clearly we should make nullsec PvE so hilariously unprofitable by forcing people to do it in teams, despite the fact that they're horrible to run in groups, not that they'd just run L4s in hisec anyway since it'd not only be less effort and l... - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 18:43:00
796. No Local - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] hmm, he does have a point about small alliances being ****** out of using supercapitals but i'm still awful at killing ratters i know, i'll claim that he's protecting the renter empire goonswarm does not have - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 18:40:00
797. No Local - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Nikk Narrel wrote: Aww, quit pretending you are protecting pvp. Everyone knows large alliances using renters make big ISK from low effort PvE players, who could not continue without local's amazing intel, creating an easy mode daycare play. Lo... - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 18:39:00
798. No Local - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] now i realize that most eve players do not understand the meaning of "risk aversion" if you're in a ship that will not survive an encounter with another player, you'd do your best to avoid such an encounter - it would be suicidal otherwise the c... - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 14:59:00
799. No Local - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Daichi Yamato wrote: Andski wrote: Nikk Narrel wrote: No, ships that could be mistaken for PvP capable were not preferred targets, the suicide ganking reference was something goons should recognize: Hulkageddon. wretched AFK miners and... - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 14:53:00
800. Dreadnaught Balancing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] watch iskflakes dig a hole for himself while he tries to argue that a ship that is required to be stationary for five minutes in order to be useful is superior to a ship that does not have to do that, deals 80% of the DPS with turrets alone, has a... - by Andski - at 2013.02.16 04:30:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.